A snowy start to Easter
Well, the forecasted snow did indeed come. When I woke up this Holy Saturday morning, snow had blanketed the earth and it continued to come down most of the day, ending in the afternoon. The practice for the Easter Vigil went well. Decorating took most of the day (see photos below: moving that many flowers around ALONE takes time, not to mention the cleaning and other arrangements). After taking all the altar boys for the Triduum out to lunch, I came back to the parish and took some photos which I will post below.
All the ceremonies of the Sacred Triduum went so very well and smoothly. The practice with the altar boys paid off -- they all did a magnificent job with very complicated ceremonies. Things were calm and I think a spirit of prayer dominated. Amazingly enough, I think I was most recollected tonight even though tonight's is the most complicated of all the ceremonies. I was just so proud to be a Pastor tonight. So many people worked hard to make this beautiful. Attendance was good. I baptized one person; received two others into the Church; confirmed those three previous and another three who were already Catholic but needed confirmation (six confirmations in all). There was a tangible "fatherly pride" for me tonight as I looked out over everything (after the lights were finally turned on!). It is a major relief that it all went so well. Easter Day is off to a great start!
Saturday, March 26, 2005
Resurrexit Sicut Dixit!

Since I got back from the Vigil before all the other monkeys, I get to wish all our readers a Blessed Easter. May you experience the Resurrection in this present hour by Christ liberating you and all whom you love from the yoke of sin.
P.S. There are two reasons this particular image of the Resurrection is fitting for my post. One is obvious, another less so...see if you can guess.

Since I got back from the Vigil before all the other monkeys, I get to wish all our readers a Blessed Easter. May you experience the Resurrection in this present hour by Christ liberating you and all whom you love from the yoke of sin.
P.S. There are two reasons this particular image of the Resurrection is fitting for my post. One is obvious, another less so...see if you can guess.
Test for a Successful Lent
Okay, readers, a quick check of your barometer of the success of your Lenten Penances. Go to the link provided above. If you respond with anything other than anger, scorn, hostility, etc., then you did okay during Lent.
Okay, readers, a quick check of your barometer of the success of your Lenten Penances. Go to the link provided above. If you respond with anything other than anger, scorn, hostility, etc., then you did okay during Lent.
Friday, March 25, 2005
Frozen in the tomb?
Well, folks, two ceremonies of the Sacred Triduum are now complete in my parish for 2005. We still have the "mother of all vigils" (as the Church refers to the Easter Vigil) tomorrow night. I am a bit concerned however, because a winter storm warning begins tonight and continues through Sunday, with predictions of 4-7 inches of snow. It looks like weather may require a much smaller fire held just inside the church, using chemicals rather than wood and things. We shall see. I am sure that whatever happens, the Easter Vigil will still be beautiful!
Tonight, thirty minutes before the start of the Good Friday Service of the Lord's Passion, the parish began the Divine Mercy Novena which will continue through April 3, the Second Sunday of Easter, Divine Mercy Sunday. I am happy to be doing this here. Actually, in the rush toward the Triduum, I hadn't given much thought to this novena. Credit goes to Fr. Tharp who mentioned in one of our phone conversations last week that he would be beginning the novena in his parish tonight. So, I quickly made a plan, announced it at last weekend's Masses, and got notice of the novena in the bulletin for Easter weekend. And then something providential happened as I was wondering how to provide information on how to pray the Chaplet of Divine Mercy, and whether I would have to take it upon myself to type up some sort of explanation sheet. I walked into the Parish Office and there was a bundle of pamphlets on the Divine Mercy that had been ordered some time ago. It was all set and ready to go! May the graces of this novena and this year's celebration of Divine Mercy rain down upon us! And, thanks, Fr. Tharp!
Well, folks, two ceremonies of the Sacred Triduum are now complete in my parish for 2005. We still have the "mother of all vigils" (as the Church refers to the Easter Vigil) tomorrow night. I am a bit concerned however, because a winter storm warning begins tonight and continues through Sunday, with predictions of 4-7 inches of snow. It looks like weather may require a much smaller fire held just inside the church, using chemicals rather than wood and things. We shall see. I am sure that whatever happens, the Easter Vigil will still be beautiful!
Tonight, thirty minutes before the start of the Good Friday Service of the Lord's Passion, the parish began the Divine Mercy Novena which will continue through April 3, the Second Sunday of Easter, Divine Mercy Sunday. I am happy to be doing this here. Actually, in the rush toward the Triduum, I hadn't given much thought to this novena. Credit goes to Fr. Tharp who mentioned in one of our phone conversations last week that he would be beginning the novena in his parish tonight. So, I quickly made a plan, announced it at last weekend's Masses, and got notice of the novena in the bulletin for Easter weekend. And then something providential happened as I was wondering how to provide information on how to pray the Chaplet of Divine Mercy, and whether I would have to take it upon myself to type up some sort of explanation sheet. I walked into the Parish Office and there was a bundle of pamphlets on the Divine Mercy that had been ordered some time ago. It was all set and ready to go! May the graces of this novena and this year's celebration of Divine Mercy rain down upon us! And, thanks, Fr. Tharp!

Good Friday, St. Peter Catholic Church, Guymon, Oklahoma. I took this shot of the cross with lit candles after everyone had left the church following tonight's service. After taking this shot, I removed the purple cloth from the crucifix, as the liturgical books suggest. Tomorrow the purple cloths covering the images of saints will come down.
Thursday, March 24, 2005
The Gauntlet's Down; Join in NOW!
I spent the entire day rubbing my temple, attempting to send Mark every good idea and sentence in my head, so that his book would be finished sooner. Instead, he came up with this. All in all, a good use of my delta waves....
I spent the entire day rubbing my temple, attempting to send Mark every good idea and sentence in my head, so that his book would be finished sooner. Instead, he came up with this. All in all, a good use of my delta waves....
Thank You for the Irony
I thought there was something else, apart from obvious issues, that was bothering me concerning the Schiavo case. A tip of the biretta to Barbara Nicolosi for the link.
I thought there was something else, apart from obvious issues, that was bothering me concerning the Schiavo case. A tip of the biretta to Barbara Nicolosi for the link.
A Letter from Dad
This one is for all my brother priests on this, our special feast day. While we can look to our particular date of ordination as the moment of our participation in the Priesthood of Christ, this day is the cause for our participation. Jesus wants every ordained priest to be the continuation of His priestly outpouring. In short, when someone sees you, may their hearts and minds say, "God is for us, not against us!"
This one is for all my brother priests on this, our special feast day. While we can look to our particular date of ordination as the moment of our participation in the Priesthood of Christ, this day is the cause for our participation. Jesus wants every ordained priest to be the continuation of His priestly outpouring. In short, when someone sees you, may their hearts and minds say, "God is for us, not against us!"
Wednesday, March 23, 2005
Civil Disobedience Revisited
For our parents' generation, questions of the rights of minorities and women created this response. Isn't it peculiar that we now have to fight to make sure that a person is treated as a person?
For our parents' generation, questions of the rights of minorities and women created this response. Isn't it peculiar that we now have to fight to make sure that a person is treated as a person?
I should hope so...
Holy Week activities have only served to heat up the debate. This case is very important and so, regardless of the outcome, a lot of people suddenly have to give a lot of thought to end of life issues.
Holy Week activities have only served to heat up the debate. This case is very important and so, regardless of the outcome, a lot of people suddenly have to give a lot of thought to end of life issues.
Church Tapped to Square Off Against Spidey
At first, I thought this would be a mano-a-mano death match between Cardinal Egan and the Websligner. Alas, I was mistaken.
For those who remember this actor from Wings on NBC or his most recent turn in the excellent film, Sideways, I am looking forward to what this third Spidey flick might generate. The question remains though, which villian will he be?
I think we can reasonable eliminate the Lizard from the list as we have already met Dr. Connors. They could change actors; it's not unheard of. Venom could be a likely candidate, but there is some question if the screenwriters are going to follow the TV cartoon story line which had J. Jonah Jameson's son become the first alien symbiote host or if somehow they will bring Eddie Brock into the picture. Hmmm...who else? Submit choices in the comments area, but I am going with (in order of likelihood) Mysterio, Electro, or Venom.
At first, I thought this would be a mano-a-mano death match between Cardinal Egan and the Websligner. Alas, I was mistaken.
For those who remember this actor from Wings on NBC or his most recent turn in the excellent film, Sideways, I am looking forward to what this third Spidey flick might generate. The question remains though, which villian will he be?
I think we can reasonable eliminate the Lizard from the list as we have already met Dr. Connors. They could change actors; it's not unheard of. Venom could be a likely candidate, but there is some question if the screenwriters are going to follow the TV cartoon story line which had J. Jonah Jameson's son become the first alien symbiote host or if somehow they will bring Eddie Brock into the picture. Hmmm...who else? Submit choices in the comments area, but I am going with (in order of likelihood) Mysterio, Electro, or Venom.
Has it come to this?
It's a bad sign when the governor of a state has to step in and defend one of his constituents from their husband. Any civil rights ramifications can be discussed as well.
It's a bad sign when the governor of a state has to step in and defend one of his constituents from their husband. Any civil rights ramifications can be discussed as well.
Tuesday, March 22, 2005
Archdiocese of Oklahoma City: Chrism Mass 2005
Yesterday was the annual Chrism Mass for our archdiocese. At this Mass the bishop, gathered with most of the priests of the archdiocese, deacons, religious, and lay faithful, blesses the three oils used in the Sacraments for the coming year. The Mass is held at the Cathedral, which required your ragemonkeys to hit the great American highway once again. As I was half-way into my four hour plus drive, I called Fr. Tharp via cell phone and we spoke briefly. He informed me that before the Chrism Mass he would be attending his priest support group meeting at the Catholic Pastoral Center of the archdiocese. Some two hours later as I was entering the city, a need made itself known. I realized that the very first thing I would need to do upon getting to Oklahoma City would be to find a restroom. The highway that I drive in on takes me literally by the Catholic Pastoral Center (CPC). So, it was a natural place to pull off the road, run in, and move on to do a few errands before the Chrism Mass ... or so I thought. As I was waiting for a green arrow to turn into the CPC, I looked at the clock and realized Fr. Tharp's group was already meeting. My brain then registered that I would most likely see Fr. Tharp's car (the Batmobile) parked at the CPC and then ... giddy from my four hour drive, the very next thought my brain registered was: shoe polish!
Yes, I quickly did a u-turn, visited the nearby Wal-Mart for some white shoe polish, and returned to the CPC. I pulled up next to Fr. Tharp's car and I began to howl with laughter as I thought of his reaction to my prank. I then proceeded to write messages all over his windows. Yes, I got a few strange looks from some CPC visitors and employees -- but no one stopped long enough to inquire what was going on. Only later did I find out another hilarious witness to the prank. It seems that one of Fr. Tharp's group members was late and had not arrived yet to the meeting as I was in the parking lot shoe polishing the car. From an upstairs lounge area, another of Fr. Tharp's group members got up to look out the window to check the parking lot for the missing member's car. All the while, Fr. Tharp was sitting in the lounge but had not gotten up to look out the window! This other priest told me later that he saw me and put forth his best effort to not reveal what was going on. It worked!
I drove away from the CPC parking lot expecting a phone call from Fr. Tharp any moment. But one didn't come until much later. The funny thing is Fr. Tharp didn't realize I had done the deed. So, I let him think it was someone else for a while, telling him to leave the messages on the car, and to come to the Cathedral so I could take pictures of the Batmobile. After taking all the photos I revealed to him that I had been the prankster. Fr. Tharp, you've been punk'd!
Yesterday was the annual Chrism Mass for our archdiocese. At this Mass the bishop, gathered with most of the priests of the archdiocese, deacons, religious, and lay faithful, blesses the three oils used in the Sacraments for the coming year. The Mass is held at the Cathedral, which required your ragemonkeys to hit the great American highway once again. As I was half-way into my four hour plus drive, I called Fr. Tharp via cell phone and we spoke briefly. He informed me that before the Chrism Mass he would be attending his priest support group meeting at the Catholic Pastoral Center of the archdiocese. Some two hours later as I was entering the city, a need made itself known. I realized that the very first thing I would need to do upon getting to Oklahoma City would be to find a restroom. The highway that I drive in on takes me literally by the Catholic Pastoral Center (CPC). So, it was a natural place to pull off the road, run in, and move on to do a few errands before the Chrism Mass ... or so I thought. As I was waiting for a green arrow to turn into the CPC, I looked at the clock and realized Fr. Tharp's group was already meeting. My brain then registered that I would most likely see Fr. Tharp's car (the Batmobile) parked at the CPC and then ... giddy from my four hour drive, the very next thought my brain registered was: shoe polish!
Yes, I quickly did a u-turn, visited the nearby Wal-Mart for some white shoe polish, and returned to the CPC. I pulled up next to Fr. Tharp's car and I began to howl with laughter as I thought of his reaction to my prank. I then proceeded to write messages all over his windows. Yes, I got a few strange looks from some CPC visitors and employees -- but no one stopped long enough to inquire what was going on. Only later did I find out another hilarious witness to the prank. It seems that one of Fr. Tharp's group members was late and had not arrived yet to the meeting as I was in the parking lot shoe polishing the car. From an upstairs lounge area, another of Fr. Tharp's group members got up to look out the window to check the parking lot for the missing member's car. All the while, Fr. Tharp was sitting in the lounge but had not gotten up to look out the window! This other priest told me later that he saw me and put forth his best effort to not reveal what was going on. It worked!
I drove away from the CPC parking lot expecting a phone call from Fr. Tharp any moment. But one didn't come until much later. The funny thing is Fr. Tharp didn't realize I had done the deed. So, I let him think it was someone else for a while, telling him to leave the messages on the car, and to come to the Cathedral so I could take pictures of the Batmobile. After taking all the photos I revealed to him that I had been the prankster. Fr. Tharp, you've been punk'd!
I have included photos of the prank, and a few other photos, below. There was one message I didn't get a picture of. It was on the windshield of Fr. Tharp's car and he had to wash it off in order to safely drive. It read: "Destroying relativism and doctrinal indifference!" with an area pointing to the driver's side of the windshield.
Friday, March 18, 2005
I Saw It in the Mirror
As I write this, Terri begins her descent into death. As I listened to the news today, I figured out the key to the puzzle. The issue is not whether Terri said, essentially, I don't want to be kept alive this way. The issue is whether her feeding tube consistutes extraordinary means of life support. Anyone can refuse life support that 1.) is not going to be of benefit for the person, 2.) is going to place an undo burden on the patient, and 3.)is not ultimately address the illness. The Catholic Encyclopedia online can give you more info.
And here is where the case starts to swirl. Without examination, no diagnosis and prognosis can take place. Without diagnosis and prognosis, a list of necessary treatments cannot be drawn up. With a list of necessary treatments, then, it seems to me, anything and everything can seem extraordinary because the value of the patient as a person and a subject of health is not in the midst of the question.
As I write this, Terri begins her descent into death. As I listened to the news today, I figured out the key to the puzzle. The issue is not whether Terri said, essentially, I don't want to be kept alive this way. The issue is whether her feeding tube consistutes extraordinary means of life support. Anyone can refuse life support that 1.) is not going to be of benefit for the person, 2.) is going to place an undo burden on the patient, and 3.)is not ultimately address the illness. The Catholic Encyclopedia online can give you more info.
And here is where the case starts to swirl. Without examination, no diagnosis and prognosis can take place. Without diagnosis and prognosis, a list of necessary treatments cannot be drawn up. With a list of necessary treatments, then, it seems to me, anything and everything can seem extraordinary because the value of the patient as a person and a subject of health is not in the midst of the question.
Two for the Price of One
I am so irritated over how the news portrays this situation with Terri Schiavo as a right-to-die case. If there is, it is the only right that no one will be able to deprive you of. Terri has severe brain damage, but is not PVS. How can I tell? She isn't drooling. Drooling usually is a sign of being unable to swallow, and that is one of the diagnostic keys to assess how severe one's brain damage is or how likely the possibility of recovery is. On top of that, from what I have read, Terri has never received a proper PET scan or MRI or any of the other things that go into making a diagnosis of any kind. Terri could be taught how to speak more clearly and even eat with a fork and spoon, but for that to happen, Terri must receive some physical therapy. Why Michael or the doctors have not provided this is beyond me. As Terri's mother says, "She just eats differently than you or I."
Hence, this post is two for the price of one: fisking media and promoting life. It's religious multitasking.
I am so irritated over how the news portrays this situation with Terri Schiavo as a right-to-die case. If there is, it is the only right that no one will be able to deprive you of. Terri has severe brain damage, but is not PVS. How can I tell? She isn't drooling. Drooling usually is a sign of being unable to swallow, and that is one of the diagnostic keys to assess how severe one's brain damage is or how likely the possibility of recovery is. On top of that, from what I have read, Terri has never received a proper PET scan or MRI or any of the other things that go into making a diagnosis of any kind. Terri could be taught how to speak more clearly and even eat with a fork and spoon, but for that to happen, Terri must receive some physical therapy. Why Michael or the doctors have not provided this is beyond me. As Terri's mother says, "She just eats differently than you or I."
Hence, this post is two for the price of one: fisking media and promoting life. It's religious multitasking.
Thank You for the Music
I wanted to give a tip of the biretta to the various persons who are working to get the word out about Terri Schiavo. The links are given below.
After Abortion
Blogs for Terri
Davetown
Thrown Back (in spite of snarky comments left here, I still hold Fr. Johansen as a further sign of what's right in the Catholic clergy today. His blog is a galmafrey of Terri-related information.)
Veritatis Splendor
I will refresh this post and update it for the next few days probably up to Holy Thursday.
I wanted to give a tip of the biretta to the various persons who are working to get the word out about Terri Schiavo. The links are given below.
After Abortion
Blogs for Terri
Davetown
Thrown Back (in spite of snarky comments left here, I still hold Fr. Johansen as a further sign of what's right in the Catholic clergy today. His blog is a galmafrey of Terri-related information.)
Veritatis Splendor
I will refresh this post and update it for the next few days probably up to Holy Thursday.
Hole in Your Soul
My apologies for not reporting sooner. Blogger was being an absolute beast.
This morning, I had on my mind, Terri Schiavo. I had listened to Drew Mariani's talk radio program last night after the gym. He reported that Terri's feeding tube was to be pulled as of 1:00 p.m. EST. As I listened to his impassioned plea, I could not help but sit there and feel stupid and useless. After all, I spend all this time complaining that I have too much to eat, and here is a woman for whom that is about to be non-issue.
When I got up, I decided that Terri would be the subject of the homily because this case touches the very heart of basic question. In today's Gospel, John 10:31-42, we see the Jewish people reach for stones to kill Jesus for blasphemy. Normally, we say, "What a bunch of doofuses!" There is something to be praised, though, in the response of the people. In their minds, it was very clear that God is God and Man is man (creature) and never the two shall meet. If you are one, you cannot be the other. Hence, the task for their conversion to accept the coming of Christ, is to accept that Man and God can live as one without confusion or comingling of those things that are proper to each.
Take a step back for a moment and see if you see what I see. Judge Greer and Michael Schiavo, in a certain sense, are taking to themselves perogatives that are proper to God. Is her life worth anything? Does she deserve to live? These are questions that only a Creator can answer, and the creature can only guess at. Logically, then, if there is a question of value or worth, judgment should favor whatever goods are present and not penalize for those goods which are not necessarily demonstrable. From what Mr. Mariani mentioned on yesterday's broadcast, Judge Greer ruled that when the feeding tube is removed, Terri may receive nothing by mouth: no water, no Jello, not even any Vasoline to keep her lips from cracking. In a normal hospice situation you would be able to swab the mouth with ice or a moistened sponge. Clearly, this is not a normal situation.
Take one step forward. Worse case scenario, Terri's tube is removed today. Since most folks can only survive about 3-4 days without water, that would mean Terri's intense suffering would coincide with the beginning of Holy Week and the Paschal Triduum. I guess we still have not learned our lesson. The Lord takes the side of the afflicted, the needy, the little ones. When He is lifted up on the Cross, lifted up like the serpent in the desert, He is accepting to Himself, all the failures of human history. Therefore, when we treat the least of our brothers as though they were nothing and non-persons, we simply re-present the Cross to Jesus and tell Him to get moving. We don't want to be troubled with you.
Thankfully it looks like Congress et al. are taking some steps but it might be too little, too late. As those called to spiritual combat, we can use the time profitably through pray, fasting, and almsgiving. Pray and intercede especially for the judge, Michael Schiavo, and Terri's parents. I don't want to assume bad motives on the judge's or Michael's part, but my inner sensors are telling me something different.
My apologies for not reporting sooner. Blogger was being an absolute beast.
This morning, I had on my mind, Terri Schiavo. I had listened to Drew Mariani's talk radio program last night after the gym. He reported that Terri's feeding tube was to be pulled as of 1:00 p.m. EST. As I listened to his impassioned plea, I could not help but sit there and feel stupid and useless. After all, I spend all this time complaining that I have too much to eat, and here is a woman for whom that is about to be non-issue.
When I got up, I decided that Terri would be the subject of the homily because this case touches the very heart of basic question. In today's Gospel, John 10:31-42, we see the Jewish people reach for stones to kill Jesus for blasphemy. Normally, we say, "What a bunch of doofuses!" There is something to be praised, though, in the response of the people. In their minds, it was very clear that God is God and Man is man (creature) and never the two shall meet. If you are one, you cannot be the other. Hence, the task for their conversion to accept the coming of Christ, is to accept that Man and God can live as one without confusion or comingling of those things that are proper to each.
Take a step back for a moment and see if you see what I see. Judge Greer and Michael Schiavo, in a certain sense, are taking to themselves perogatives that are proper to God. Is her life worth anything? Does she deserve to live? These are questions that only a Creator can answer, and the creature can only guess at. Logically, then, if there is a question of value or worth, judgment should favor whatever goods are present and not penalize for those goods which are not necessarily demonstrable. From what Mr. Mariani mentioned on yesterday's broadcast, Judge Greer ruled that when the feeding tube is removed, Terri may receive nothing by mouth: no water, no Jello, not even any Vasoline to keep her lips from cracking. In a normal hospice situation you would be able to swab the mouth with ice or a moistened sponge. Clearly, this is not a normal situation.
Take one step forward. Worse case scenario, Terri's tube is removed today. Since most folks can only survive about 3-4 days without water, that would mean Terri's intense suffering would coincide with the beginning of Holy Week and the Paschal Triduum. I guess we still have not learned our lesson. The Lord takes the side of the afflicted, the needy, the little ones. When He is lifted up on the Cross, lifted up like the serpent in the desert, He is accepting to Himself, all the failures of human history. Therefore, when we treat the least of our brothers as though they were nothing and non-persons, we simply re-present the Cross to Jesus and tell Him to get moving. We don't want to be troubled with you.
Thankfully it looks like Congress et al. are taking some steps but it might be too little, too late. As those called to spiritual combat, we can use the time profitably through pray, fasting, and almsgiving. Pray and intercede especially for the judge, Michael Schiavo, and Terri's parents. I don't want to assume bad motives on the judge's or Michael's part, but my inner sensors are telling me something different.
Demanding photo credit
I was delighted to see the photo Fr. Tharp posted below. I had actually forgotten about it. Allow me to explain.
Last week, Fr. Tharp and I were in Oklahoma City, generally being menaces and theologically obnoxious. As we drove down one particular road, looking for the next ridiculous prank to pull, we noticed the sign you see posted below. Actually, I think I saw it and started laughing, but that is an aside. The sign is outside of The Village United Methodist Church. It advertises the final presentation about a 12 step process given by -- and get this, folks -- Rev. Chuck Dollarhide. No joke!
We just howled in laughter because we thought it was an hysterical name for a pastor -- dollarhide. Uh, oh, grab your wallets, here comes the pastor! OH, no, Rev. Dollarhide is asking for money again. What are we building this week?
Anyway, we quickly decided that the photo of the sign was something we needed to post for CRM readers. So, Fr. Tharp, ever-so-skillfully at the wheel of his Batmobile, turned into the parking lot of the church, drove slowly to the entrance nearest the church sign, rolled down his tinted window, and used his cell phone camera to take a snap shot. Well, it was very sunny that day and the photo was almost impossible to make out. So, to bump the nonsense up another notch, I offered to get out of the car, walk up to the sign and take another shot. That is the shot you see below (and it is still hard to make out well).
So, folks, it may not seem funny to anyone else, but Fr. Tharp and I howled in laughter at what other people passing by the church that day saw and might have thought. Picture it with me: There we were in a black car with tinted windows occupying a strange spot in the entryway to the church. Then I step out, Roman collar and all, and creep across the lawn of the Methodist church to get closer to the sign. Drivers passing by and the old ladies in the parking lot probably wondered what was going on.
Thus is the story of the Rev. Dollarhide photo below.
I was delighted to see the photo Fr. Tharp posted below. I had actually forgotten about it. Allow me to explain.
Last week, Fr. Tharp and I were in Oklahoma City, generally being menaces and theologically obnoxious. As we drove down one particular road, looking for the next ridiculous prank to pull, we noticed the sign you see posted below. Actually, I think I saw it and started laughing, but that is an aside. The sign is outside of The Village United Methodist Church. It advertises the final presentation about a 12 step process given by -- and get this, folks -- Rev. Chuck Dollarhide. No joke!
We just howled in laughter because we thought it was an hysterical name for a pastor -- dollarhide. Uh, oh, grab your wallets, here comes the pastor! OH, no, Rev. Dollarhide is asking for money again. What are we building this week?
Anyway, we quickly decided that the photo of the sign was something we needed to post for CRM readers. So, Fr. Tharp, ever-so-skillfully at the wheel of his Batmobile, turned into the parking lot of the church, drove slowly to the entrance nearest the church sign, rolled down his tinted window, and used his cell phone camera to take a snap shot. Well, it was very sunny that day and the photo was almost impossible to make out. So, to bump the nonsense up another notch, I offered to get out of the car, walk up to the sign and take another shot. That is the shot you see below (and it is still hard to make out well).
So, folks, it may not seem funny to anyone else, but Fr. Tharp and I howled in laughter at what other people passing by the church that day saw and might have thought. Picture it with me: There we were in a black car with tinted windows occupying a strange spot in the entryway to the church. Then I step out, Roman collar and all, and creep across the lawn of the Methodist church to get closer to the sign. Drivers passing by and the old ladies in the parking lot probably wondered what was going on.
Thus is the story of the Rev. Dollarhide photo below.
Thursday, March 17, 2005

Money, Money, Money
Posted by Hello
This was discovered by Fr. Hamilton and I during one of our romps through OKC. It seems an unfortunate name for a pastor. I mean, c'mon, Dollarhide? The jokes practically write themselves. Kudos to Fr. Hamilton for getting the shot and looking like an uberdoofus while doing it.
Take a Chance on Me!
On the good news front, it turns out that OSV is going to take another look at the Borromeo Project for publication. Thanks to my inside operatives who are helping me to take over the western world. I worked up a quick marketing proposal to help the publishing committee to say yes, i.e. they will take a chance on me. If they don't, I will start to put together a self-published empire. I'll keep you informed.
On the good news front, it turns out that OSV is going to take another look at the Borromeo Project for publication. Thanks to my inside operatives who are helping me to take over the western world. I worked up a quick marketing proposal to help the publishing committee to say yes, i.e. they will take a chance on me. If they don't, I will start to put together a self-published empire. I'll keep you informed.
Crazy World
The world around me continues to get crazy. First, there was the notice from Austrailia. Then, there was the interview on Relevant Radio. Now the Miami Herald has mentioned CRM TWICE (?!) in its pages. Thanks to Ms. Alexandra Alter for her coverage.
Check them out here:
Blogging for God
Blogging: That Real-Time Religion;-)
The world around me continues to get crazy. First, there was the notice from Austrailia. Then, there was the interview on Relevant Radio. Now the Miami Herald has mentioned CRM TWICE (?!) in its pages. Thanks to Ms. Alexandra Alter for her coverage.
Check them out here:
Blogging for God
Blogging: That Real-Time Religion;-)
Voulez Vouz!
Earlier, I mentioned how my niece was fretting over whether or not she would pass her second try at the driver's test. Well, she did! Hurray for the junior Ragemonkey in training. For all those who live in the OKC metro, watch yourself on the roads -- a new menace is spawned.
Of course, I remember my own days of wanting a car and so a new mode of whining will begin. I was most pleased with my sister who categorically said, "The car is MINE; she will be borrowing it. When she goes to college, then she can have it." Sadly, the next few months and weeks will be a constant refrain of "I want you" to every car for sale she sees. Since my first car was a beat-down junker, I hope my niece will continue the pattern.
Earlier, I mentioned how my niece was fretting over whether or not she would pass her second try at the driver's test. Well, she did! Hurray for the junior Ragemonkey in training. For all those who live in the OKC metro, watch yourself on the roads -- a new menace is spawned.
Of course, I remember my own days of wanting a car and so a new mode of whining will begin. I was most pleased with my sister who categorically said, "The car is MINE; she will be borrowing it. When she goes to college, then she can have it." Sadly, the next few months and weeks will be a constant refrain of "I want you" to every car for sale she sees. Since my first car was a beat-down junker, I hope my niece will continue the pattern.
Seeing purple
Well, I am just about done covering the crucifixes and images of saints in the church. I am still trying to rig some way to cover the enormous image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, but I think I have an idea. We also have many smaller images, icons and stuff in the church foyer area. Since we don't have enough pieces of purple cloth, I think I may just remove those images from the wall until the Easter Vigil. An even more severe deprivation of the senses (than the previous days of Lent) is now upon us. We cover images of the Lord's Passion, and Crucifixion so that we, in a liturgical sense, walk through those events as if for the first time, seeing it happen before us, rather than looking upon the Crucifix as a past event. As well, all the images of holiness (statues of saints) that are before us are covered since they would be nothing without the act of the Supremely Holy One, Jesus Christ the Lord! How much more joyful will Easter be when our starved senses have a veritable feast opened before them again!
Well, I am just about done covering the crucifixes and images of saints in the church. I am still trying to rig some way to cover the enormous image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, but I think I have an idea. We also have many smaller images, icons and stuff in the church foyer area. Since we don't have enough pieces of purple cloth, I think I may just remove those images from the wall until the Easter Vigil. An even more severe deprivation of the senses (than the previous days of Lent) is now upon us. We cover images of the Lord's Passion, and Crucifixion so that we, in a liturgical sense, walk through those events as if for the first time, seeing it happen before us, rather than looking upon the Crucifix as a past event. As well, all the images of holiness (statues of saints) that are before us are covered since they would be nothing without the act of the Supremely Holy One, Jesus Christ the Lord! How much more joyful will Easter be when our starved senses have a veritable feast opened before them again!
S.O.S.!
Once again, I keep coming back to a basic premise: Abortion is acceptable because of a defective notion of personhood. You can mask it with terms like "quality of life" or "contingent health questions" but you can't avoid it. You are person because you, on the natural front, have everything you need to be a fully developed and differentiated person. On the supernatural front, you as a human person are created differently from the rest of creation that meets your eyes.
Once again, I keep coming back to a basic premise: Abortion is acceptable because of a defective notion of personhood. You can mask it with terms like "quality of life" or "contingent health questions" but you can't avoid it. You are person because you, on the natural front, have everything you need to be a fully developed and differentiated person. On the supernatural front, you as a human person are created differently from the rest of creation that meets your eyes.
Wednesday, March 16, 2005
Happy Birthday
to my brother John, who celebrates his 24th birthday today! You've come a long way, little bro. I hope today was a good one. You are in my thoughts and prayers in a special way today!
With any luck this will get posted. I have been trying all night and Blogger has been eating this post and others.
to my brother John, who celebrates his 24th birthday today! You've come a long way, little bro. I hope today was a good one. You are in my thoughts and prayers in a special way today!
With any luck this will get posted. I have been trying all night and Blogger has been eating this post and others.
Watch Out!
I guess there is something to be said for passive learning and watching the Food Channel...
I guess there is something to be said for passive learning and watching the Food Channel...
| Bacardi 151 Congratulations! You're 144 proof, with specific scores in beer (60) , wine (116), and liquor (121). |
| All right. No more messing around. Your knowledge of alcohol is so high that you have drinking and getting plastered down to a science. Sure, you could get wasted drinking beer, but who needs all those trips to the bathroom? You head straight for the bar and pick up that which is most efficient. |
|
My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
| Link: The Alcohol Knowledge Test written by hoppersplit on Ok Cupid |
Gimme! Gimme! Gimme...
a break already! Why does American Idol continue to be considered newsworthy?
a break already! Why does American Idol continue to be considered newsworthy?
Tuesday, March 15, 2005
Chiquitita, tell me what's wrong...
Yesterday, I zipped down to OKC for a meeting with the Archbishop and a penance rite at one of the parishes. I decided to stay with my sister and her daughter last night because apparently the family doesn't get enough face time with yours truly. At any rate, this morning, my niece, despite being on Spring Break, was in something of a lather. You see, she was taking her second pass on her driver's test. She kept asking various questions of driving minutiae that my efforts to memorize all of Season 7 of Star Trek:Deep Space Nine wiped out. Apparently, she was a weeee bit stressed at the thought of failing her driver's test...again. Personally, the person who was the most interested in her passing the driver's test was my sister.
All of this made me recall my own sordid history with the driver's exam. I passed the written portion just fine, but I botched the first try at the driving component. The officer who accompanied me thought I was drifting into the other lane while I was changing lanes and therefore grabbed the wheel. Fifteen seconds into the test and I had already failed. This didn't prevent the officer from driving me around for another 20 minutes thus building up my hopes only to pulverize them when we got back to the testing station.
I certainly had sympathy for my niece but at some point it got to be too much for me. I turned to her and said, "Tell me what's really wrong." She replied, "I'm really nervous." I came back with, "Well, that's your problem and you can control that so stop it." Another flawless example of starting with the right question and ending with the wrong response.
Yesterday, I zipped down to OKC for a meeting with the Archbishop and a penance rite at one of the parishes. I decided to stay with my sister and her daughter last night because apparently the family doesn't get enough face time with yours truly. At any rate, this morning, my niece, despite being on Spring Break, was in something of a lather. You see, she was taking her second pass on her driver's test. She kept asking various questions of driving minutiae that my efforts to memorize all of Season 7 of Star Trek:Deep Space Nine wiped out. Apparently, she was a weeee bit stressed at the thought of failing her driver's test...again. Personally, the person who was the most interested in her passing the driver's test was my sister.
All of this made me recall my own sordid history with the driver's exam. I passed the written portion just fine, but I botched the first try at the driving component. The officer who accompanied me thought I was drifting into the other lane while I was changing lanes and therefore grabbed the wheel. Fifteen seconds into the test and I had already failed. This didn't prevent the officer from driving me around for another 20 minutes thus building up my hopes only to pulverize them when we got back to the testing station.
I certainly had sympathy for my niece but at some point it got to be too much for me. I turned to her and said, "Tell me what's really wrong." She replied, "I'm really nervous." I came back with, "Well, that's your problem and you can control that so stop it." Another flawless example of starting with the right question and ending with the wrong response.
Jesus, what are you doing out here?
That was the remark made to me by one sweet young boy as I shook hands outside of church this past Sunday morning. I chuckled when I heard the question and simply told him I am the priest, Fr. Hamilton.
But for some reason, I started thinking again about his innocent comment. We were outside of the church walls and this boy wanted to know what Jesus was doing outside of church. Now, certainly that is an innocent and natural enough question for a child to ask. But I began to think and to wonder about how many adults really have the same question: "Jesus, what you are doing out here?" In other words, how many adults, though they might never verbalize this thought (though some do!), really keep Jesus in the sanctuary and think it odd that his presence, his call to us, his mission would have any impact on the world outside of the church walls. I bet that sentiment, even if not acknowledged, is rather common in the modern mind. What does Jesus, faith in him, discipleship, have to do with my life in the world, outside of church, beyond the one hour or so I spend at Mass? I have certainly encountered some very angry people who feel threatened by a Jesus who would place demands upon how we live our lives (morality), what we say about him (doctrine), and how we practice that faith (governance). I have had people yell at me in defiance when I suggest that our faith in Christ MUST influence how we do things like voting. OH, no, you don't, Jesus! You don't have any place in the voting booth with me!
I bet that boy's innocent remark reveals an attitude that, unfortunately, isn't limited to youngsters.
That was the remark made to me by one sweet young boy as I shook hands outside of church this past Sunday morning. I chuckled when I heard the question and simply told him I am the priest, Fr. Hamilton.
But for some reason, I started thinking again about his innocent comment. We were outside of the church walls and this boy wanted to know what Jesus was doing outside of church. Now, certainly that is an innocent and natural enough question for a child to ask. But I began to think and to wonder about how many adults really have the same question: "Jesus, what you are doing out here?" In other words, how many adults, though they might never verbalize this thought (though some do!), really keep Jesus in the sanctuary and think it odd that his presence, his call to us, his mission would have any impact on the world outside of the church walls. I bet that sentiment, even if not acknowledged, is rather common in the modern mind. What does Jesus, faith in him, discipleship, have to do with my life in the world, outside of church, beyond the one hour or so I spend at Mass? I have certainly encountered some very angry people who feel threatened by a Jesus who would place demands upon how we live our lives (morality), what we say about him (doctrine), and how we practice that faith (governance). I have had people yell at me in defiance when I suggest that our faith in Christ MUST influence how we do things like voting. OH, no, you don't, Jesus! You don't have any place in the voting booth with me!
I bet that boy's innocent remark reveals an attitude that, unfortunately, isn't limited to youngsters.
Monday, March 14, 2005
Liturgical Footnote #7
By Fr. J.C. Garrett
After the Gloria, we come to the first of the “three prayers of the Mass,” the Collect or Opening Prayer. First the priest invites all those present to pray which is followed by silence. During this silence all the Faithful are asked to place themselves in the presence of God, and then to formulate their own intentions for the Mass. In other words, based on our experience of witnessing to Christ’s love in the world, we bring to each Mass we attend an intention for the needs of the Church and the world. For us to adequately to do this, we really should spend sometime in “proximate preparation” before Mass thinking about what we have experienced in the past week – at home, at work, in school – that needs to be brought to the Altar of God. The priest, being configured to Christ the Head of the Body, which is the Church, then unites or “collects” these intentions and presents them to the God.
By Fr. J.C. Garrett
After the Gloria, we come to the first of the “three prayers of the Mass,” the Collect or Opening Prayer. First the priest invites all those present to pray which is followed by silence. During this silence all the Faithful are asked to place themselves in the presence of God, and then to formulate their own intentions for the Mass. In other words, based on our experience of witnessing to Christ’s love in the world, we bring to each Mass we attend an intention for the needs of the Church and the world. For us to adequately to do this, we really should spend sometime in “proximate preparation” before Mass thinking about what we have experienced in the past week – at home, at work, in school – that needs to be brought to the Altar of God. The priest, being configured to Christ the Head of the Body, which is the Church, then unites or “collects” these intentions and presents them to the God.
There is a separate Collect for each week of the year, and for each Solemnity and Feast, and for most of the Saints’ memorials. The Collect for Mass expresses the character of the celebration. Each Collect has the same basic structure, however in our English translations this common structure can be difficult to see. “They begin by calling on God the Father, recalling some point of our faith or some moment in salvation history, and then make a request in the name of Jesus Christ and in the unity of the Holy Spirit” (Randolph, Know Him in the Breaking of the Bread, p. 60; see also GIRM #54). This is a Trinitarian prayer of the whole Church, thus at the end of it all respond “Amen.”
Do you hear the drums, Fernando?
I don't think that I mentioned this earlier, but my rectory is really run down. This month, the roof is being repaired as it has been leaking. It has been leaking so badly that one of the walls in the living room lost its plaster due to water seeping through the wall. Last week, the roofers ripped the shingles off; this week, the nailing of new shingles has begun.
This is why I am so glad that for at least a couple of days I will be away from the rectory doing some business in the city. The drumming of booted feet and the hammering of nails I won't have to endure. So the answer to the question above is, thankfully, not yet.
I don't think that I mentioned this earlier, but my rectory is really run down. This month, the roof is being repaired as it has been leaking. It has been leaking so badly that one of the walls in the living room lost its plaster due to water seeping through the wall. Last week, the roofers ripped the shingles off; this week, the nailing of new shingles has begun.
This is why I am so glad that for at least a couple of days I will be away from the rectory doing some business in the city. The drumming of booted feet and the hammering of nails I won't have to endure. So the answer to the question above is, thankfully, not yet.
He is your Brother
Homily: Fifth Sunday of Lent
Readings: Ezekiel 37:12-14; Psalm 130; Romans 8:8-11; John 11:1-45
(Despite Fr. Hamilton's protests, this is essentially what I preached this weekend.)
Botulism is a very aggressive form of bacteria that results in food poisoning. If you inject this bacteria, you can not only get sick when it attacks your gullet, you can die because it eventually attacks your nervous system. The toxins released by the bacteria cause paralysis, and then you die. Sounds fun, huh?
Currently on the market, there is a product called Botox. It is used in the cosmetic surgery front to smooth wrinkles. It does this by killing nerve endings and tissues that are bunched together thus forming the wrinkle. What's the connection? Botox is made from the toxins of botulinium bacteria. If you inject this stuff too deeply, it can kill someone, and already we have heard reports in the news of this happening.
Why would anybody do this? The only person who I can think of is a person terrified of death. They can't even cotton seeing death in the mirror. So to keep death at bay, they will do anything, even risk death. This posture is unbecoming for Christians.
The raising of Lazarus is not a proclamation of Jesus as the Lord of Life. I personally think that is reserved for Easter. Jesus raises Lazarus back to this life; when we encounter the Resurrection, we will see a very different mode of existence in the Savior. This raising of Lazarus demonstrates that Jesus is the Lord of Death. Death has no more power in His presence. This man, Lazarus, is fully dead: he is in the tomb for four days. In the Jewish mindset, decomposition begins after three days. Therefore, if one possesses faith, the result is an abandonment of the fear of death.
For the Christian, ultimately the questions of death and resurrection are not questions of when or how. Death and Resurrection are questions of who. Who has control over our life? Who will save us from death? We need not look to doctors or plastic surgeons, if the true Surgeon is known to us.
Homily: Fifth Sunday of Lent
Readings: Ezekiel 37:12-14; Psalm 130; Romans 8:8-11; John 11:1-45
(Despite Fr. Hamilton's protests, this is essentially what I preached this weekend.)
Botulism is a very aggressive form of bacteria that results in food poisoning. If you inject this bacteria, you can not only get sick when it attacks your gullet, you can die because it eventually attacks your nervous system. The toxins released by the bacteria cause paralysis, and then you die. Sounds fun, huh?
Currently on the market, there is a product called Botox. It is used in the cosmetic surgery front to smooth wrinkles. It does this by killing nerve endings and tissues that are bunched together thus forming the wrinkle. What's the connection? Botox is made from the toxins of botulinium bacteria. If you inject this stuff too deeply, it can kill someone, and already we have heard reports in the news of this happening.
Why would anybody do this? The only person who I can think of is a person terrified of death. They can't even cotton seeing death in the mirror. So to keep death at bay, they will do anything, even risk death. This posture is unbecoming for Christians.
The raising of Lazarus is not a proclamation of Jesus as the Lord of Life. I personally think that is reserved for Easter. Jesus raises Lazarus back to this life; when we encounter the Resurrection, we will see a very different mode of existence in the Savior. This raising of Lazarus demonstrates that Jesus is the Lord of Death. Death has no more power in His presence. This man, Lazarus, is fully dead: he is in the tomb for four days. In the Jewish mindset, decomposition begins after three days. Therefore, if one possesses faith, the result is an abandonment of the fear of death.
For the Christian, ultimately the questions of death and resurrection are not questions of when or how. Death and Resurrection are questions of who. Who has control over our life? Who will save us from death? We need not look to doctors or plastic surgeons, if the true Surgeon is known to us.
Waterloo!
Well, I think that I have reached a whole new low in the ongoing battle with my alarm clock. (By the way, any typos in this post are to be blamed on the fact that I don't have my glasses on. I am typing by feel and blur.) My alarm went off at the usual time and I reached out to snap on the bedside lamp. I reached out and I could feel a long stem-like feature but couldn't find the switch for the lamp. Upon reflection, that's not surprising. What I had my hand on was not the lamp; it was my container from Sonic Drive-In last night. No matter how perky a Diet Coke with Lime makes you feel it won't light up your bedroom. So, consider me defeated by a stryofoam cup.
Well, I think that I have reached a whole new low in the ongoing battle with my alarm clock. (By the way, any typos in this post are to be blamed on the fact that I don't have my glasses on. I am typing by feel and blur.) My alarm went off at the usual time and I reached out to snap on the bedside lamp. I reached out and I could feel a long stem-like feature but couldn't find the switch for the lamp. Upon reflection, that's not surprising. What I had my hand on was not the lamp; it was my container from Sonic Drive-In last night. No matter how perky a Diet Coke with Lime makes you feel it won't light up your bedroom. So, consider me defeated by a stryofoam cup.
Sunday, March 13, 2005
Knowing Me, Knowing You
Here are my three quotes:
"A holy-minded man of good renown/There was, and poor, the parson to a town,
Yet he was rich in holy thought and work./He also was a learned man, a clerk." Chaucer: Canterbury Tales
"From sullen saints and silly devotions, deliver us, dear Jesus!" St. Teresa of Avila.
"We are the music-makers and we are the dreamers of dreams." Willy Wonka, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
Here are my three quotes:
"A holy-minded man of good renown/There was, and poor, the parson to a town,
Yet he was rich in holy thought and work./He also was a learned man, a clerk." Chaucer: Canterbury Tales
"From sullen saints and silly devotions, deliver us, dear Jesus!" St. Teresa of Avila.
"We are the music-makers and we are the dreamers of dreams." Willy Wonka, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
The Name of The Game
Since Fr. Hamilton makes no mention of the concerns that the evening at Mamma Mia generated, we all know what the name of the game is. The name of the game is "Let's leave Fr. Tharp to take the hit for criticizing a show by taking it too seriously when it is clearly a fluff piece." Just for that, there will be a very subtle punishment dispensed not only to him but also to all the blog's readers. Let's hope it is not so subtle that no one notices.
Mamma Mia is the story of one girl's marriage and the effort to find her biological father. You see, mom met three men within the space of a few days and well, it was the 70's after all. Mom ends up pregnant but all three men leave. Mom raise the child on her own and does a pretty good job. But the daughter wants her dad to give her away for the wedding. So the daughter invites all three men to the island. Hilarity and hijinks ensue. Since some readers might want to see this musical, I will endeavor to not spill the beans about anything else.
Mamma Mia is known in the industry as a "slam musical" i.e. pre-existing songs are "slammed" into a story line or structure. This, of course, can be an enormous deficit to overcome because the audience is waiting, with baited breath, for a misplaced or badly placed song. I can say that with MM this was not the case. By and large, the songs were cleverly and masterfully integrated into the book of the musical. Here are two examples. Early in Act One, we meet Donna, a struggling hostel/bar owner on an unspecified Greek Island. The writers naturally have the cast break out into a rendition of "Gimme, Gimme, Gimme!" which extols the need for money in a rich man's world. Late in Act Two, the token feminist character and flat stereotype adventurer writer (and I couldn't help but think of Hunter S. Thompson at the same time) are alone right before the wedding and both are bemoaning their single status. Can you guess what happened next? The feminist character simply sang "If you change your mind..." and then cringed. It was a great use of the song, "Take a Chance on Me." This leads me to also compliment staging and choreography. Since this was a touring company, I suspect that the choreography is set for all shows, and everyone learns the same thing. However, with that said, I did find some of the blocking a little stiff, a face front style. In any other show, this could be excused or expected, but that the other elements were so well done, these little missteps stand out even more.
And speaking of missteps, even though the plot is a little thin, it should have an internal coherence. In other words, conflicts and dilemmas introduced in the first act help the audience to know the characters, to care about the characters, and frame the action as it progresses. However, in MM, it was like watching two acts from two different musicals which just happened to have the exact same names and locations. [SPOILER ALERT! Read no further if you don't want the musical ruined for you. This goes for those who saw it and loved it.]
Act One centers around a dilemma -- who is Sophie's dad and how will Donna, Sophie's mom, react when this comes about? The context for the dilemma is the impending wedding. Because the wedding is going to take place, and this is pretty much assumed by everyone in the action, this drives a need to know who the father of Sophie is pretty urgently. Move to Act Two, and in the first couple of scenes, Sophia and Sky (anyone out there who would like to make the Gnostic interpretation of this is free to leave it in the comments box) break off the engagement ON THE DAY OF THE WEDDING. It completely betrays the image of Sky that the first act spent 1.5 hours constructing. Then when the wedding does take place, it is Donna who gets married to an old flame whom she hated. The play because it is in a rush to conclude never gives good justification for why Donna would have anything to do with this chap. It descends further when Sophia proclaims that suddenly, she doesn't care which of the three men is her father. What? She spends the ENTIRE backstory and first act pining, hoping to know who he is, and now because she isn't getting married she dumps the need.
And this is the show's greatest weakness. It is TERRIBLY SUPERFICIAL. For instance, a priest is dragged into the second act, putatively to marry Sophia and Sky. The costumers made sure that the extras looked like they dropped off of a wayward sardine skimmer. But the priest (Catholic or Orthodox, they didn't bother with the distinction) looked like he stepped out of the pages of the Banana Republic catalog, wearing an awful brown linen suit. The most insulting part of the priest's presence is he could not do the sign of the Cross correctly. Allow me to demonstrate. Place both of your hands, palms flat, on the desk. Now raise your right hand so that it is level with your chest, keeping the palm parallel to the desk. Now turn your hand so that it is perpendicular to the desktop and draw back your arm as though you were going to do the Tomahawk chop. Next, raise your hand straight up to the level of your eyes, then straight down, bring your hand back to the starting point, and swing your hand from the left to the right (reverse for Orthodox readers). Congratulations. You just made a better sign of the Cross than that actor did. For the entire musical, religion was not mentioned except for two brief snarky passages about "good Catholic girls." If you aren't going to treat Catholic or Orthodox Christianity seriously, then just leave us out of it!
In the end, it is an adequate musical that quite frankly a moderately talented high school show choir could probably pull off. It has left me with the idea for a slam musical based on the music of the Alan Parson Project. I can see it now, my name in lights..."I want to be a producer/ and work on old Broadway..."
Since Fr. Hamilton makes no mention of the concerns that the evening at Mamma Mia generated, we all know what the name of the game is. The name of the game is "Let's leave Fr. Tharp to take the hit for criticizing a show by taking it too seriously when it is clearly a fluff piece." Just for that, there will be a very subtle punishment dispensed not only to him but also to all the blog's readers. Let's hope it is not so subtle that no one notices.
Mamma Mia is the story of one girl's marriage and the effort to find her biological father. You see, mom met three men within the space of a few days and well, it was the 70's after all. Mom ends up pregnant but all three men leave. Mom raise the child on her own and does a pretty good job. But the daughter wants her dad to give her away for the wedding. So the daughter invites all three men to the island. Hilarity and hijinks ensue. Since some readers might want to see this musical, I will endeavor to not spill the beans about anything else.
Mamma Mia is known in the industry as a "slam musical" i.e. pre-existing songs are "slammed" into a story line or structure. This, of course, can be an enormous deficit to overcome because the audience is waiting, with baited breath, for a misplaced or badly placed song. I can say that with MM this was not the case. By and large, the songs were cleverly and masterfully integrated into the book of the musical. Here are two examples. Early in Act One, we meet Donna, a struggling hostel/bar owner on an unspecified Greek Island. The writers naturally have the cast break out into a rendition of "Gimme, Gimme, Gimme!" which extols the need for money in a rich man's world. Late in Act Two, the token feminist character and flat stereotype adventurer writer (and I couldn't help but think of Hunter S. Thompson at the same time) are alone right before the wedding and both are bemoaning their single status. Can you guess what happened next? The feminist character simply sang "If you change your mind..." and then cringed. It was a great use of the song, "Take a Chance on Me." This leads me to also compliment staging and choreography. Since this was a touring company, I suspect that the choreography is set for all shows, and everyone learns the same thing. However, with that said, I did find some of the blocking a little stiff, a face front style. In any other show, this could be excused or expected, but that the other elements were so well done, these little missteps stand out even more.
And speaking of missteps, even though the plot is a little thin, it should have an internal coherence. In other words, conflicts and dilemmas introduced in the first act help the audience to know the characters, to care about the characters, and frame the action as it progresses. However, in MM, it was like watching two acts from two different musicals which just happened to have the exact same names and locations. [SPOILER ALERT! Read no further if you don't want the musical ruined for you. This goes for those who saw it and loved it.]
Act One centers around a dilemma -- who is Sophie's dad and how will Donna, Sophie's mom, react when this comes about? The context for the dilemma is the impending wedding. Because the wedding is going to take place, and this is pretty much assumed by everyone in the action, this drives a need to know who the father of Sophie is pretty urgently. Move to Act Two, and in the first couple of scenes, Sophia and Sky (anyone out there who would like to make the Gnostic interpretation of this is free to leave it in the comments box) break off the engagement ON THE DAY OF THE WEDDING. It completely betrays the image of Sky that the first act spent 1.5 hours constructing. Then when the wedding does take place, it is Donna who gets married to an old flame whom she hated. The play because it is in a rush to conclude never gives good justification for why Donna would have anything to do with this chap. It descends further when Sophia proclaims that suddenly, she doesn't care which of the three men is her father. What? She spends the ENTIRE backstory and first act pining, hoping to know who he is, and now because she isn't getting married she dumps the need.
And this is the show's greatest weakness. It is TERRIBLY SUPERFICIAL. For instance, a priest is dragged into the second act, putatively to marry Sophia and Sky. The costumers made sure that the extras looked like they dropped off of a wayward sardine skimmer. But the priest (Catholic or Orthodox, they didn't bother with the distinction) looked like he stepped out of the pages of the Banana Republic catalog, wearing an awful brown linen suit. The most insulting part of the priest's presence is he could not do the sign of the Cross correctly. Allow me to demonstrate. Place both of your hands, palms flat, on the desk. Now raise your right hand so that it is level with your chest, keeping the palm parallel to the desk. Now turn your hand so that it is perpendicular to the desktop and draw back your arm as though you were going to do the Tomahawk chop. Next, raise your hand straight up to the level of your eyes, then straight down, bring your hand back to the starting point, and swing your hand from the left to the right (reverse for Orthodox readers). Congratulations. You just made a better sign of the Cross than that actor did. For the entire musical, religion was not mentioned except for two brief snarky passages about "good Catholic girls." If you aren't going to treat Catholic or Orthodox Christianity seriously, then just leave us out of it!
In the end, it is an adequate musical that quite frankly a moderately talented high school show choir could probably pull off. It has left me with the idea for a slam musical based on the music of the Alan Parson Project. I can see it now, my name in lights..."I want to be a producer/ and work on old Broadway..."
Friday, March 11, 2005
Two very different evenings of entertainment
Last night was an outrageous evening at the Oklahoma City Civic Center seeing "Mamma Mia!" with Fr. Tharp and tonight was the movies with my dad and stepmom seeing "Hotel Rwanda".
Weeks and weeks ago Fr. Tharp had asked if I would like to see "Mamma Mia!" This is a musical written around songs from the 1970's (and a bit into the 80's) international hit band ABBA. Of course, ABBA's songs, despite having disbanded in 1982, still play on and are known by a rather large audience. We've all probably heard the music. The notion of a musical written around this music, I will admit, both horrified and intrigued me. On the one hand, it sounds like a hopelessly stupid scheme to pass as a musical; on the other hand, the music is rather nostalgic and, in its time, it was rather innovative. I think the beginning of the musical itself actually capitalized on these sentiments. A faceless voice over the sound system made the typical announcements for live theatre (regarding no flash photography, recording devices, or cell phones and other electronic devices in use) but added something like this, "A fair warning to our patrons: White spandex and platform boots will be in use during the performance!" It was certainly loads of fun to hear the songs done live. Until last night I had only heard the songs on the radio or on CD. But, what really surprised me was that there is really a story, a legitimate plot to the show. Granted, the plot may be a bit thin, but it wasn't nearly as thin as I had anticipated. There was minor tragedy, conflict, and resolution. And the writers really were clever at how they incorporated ABBA songs into the script. In addition, the very simple set was superbly employed and the actors themselves moved props and helped change scenes in a manner that can only be described as part of the choreography for the show (only done with low lighting). All in all, it was very enjoyable and clever. It certainly won't stand the test of time as memorable drama and -- I pray -- generations from now won't look back on us and see "Mamma Mia!" and the likes as what we ourselves viewed as normative theatre. I admit, I am a bit worried about this sign of our cultural times because "Mamma Mia!" is not the only musical out there incorporating pop songs. We shall see.... I'll let Fr. Tharp add any more details about the show that he might want to share.
Tonight was a very heavy drama about the genocide in Rwanda in 1994. It was an excellent film based on historical events that told the real life story of a man in the midst of this sadly real human drama. The film captured the atrocity and the weight of the tragedy without showing gratuitous violence and without being oppressively bloody. In the midst of the ugliness of the tragedy, the beauty of human goodness was also visible (reminds me somewhat of "The Passion of the Christ"). I think the lead actor (I don't remember his name) performed exceedingly well. As an African man he was very much involved in, and overwhelmed by, the events of the unrest in his country. But the movie also showed how his role as the manager of a hotel-turned-refugee-camp placed on him a certain duty or role that he had to play -- a certain facade he had to keep up -- in order to bring some sense of stability to terribly frightened people. Ultimately, of course, this was a role he played to save lives. It was gripping film. It made me think about the larger connections we all ought to know and feel as members of the human race. It made me think how easy it is to see such terrible storied on the news and to go on, leading my daily life with little impact or even thought to the depth of human tragedy in other parts of the world.
I would highly recommend "Hotel Rwanda" to anyone and, should "Mamma Mia!" come to your town, I think you would enjoy a little 70's flashback!
Last night was an outrageous evening at the Oklahoma City Civic Center seeing "Mamma Mia!" with Fr. Tharp and tonight was the movies with my dad and stepmom seeing "Hotel Rwanda".
Weeks and weeks ago Fr. Tharp had asked if I would like to see "Mamma Mia!" This is a musical written around songs from the 1970's (and a bit into the 80's) international hit band ABBA. Of course, ABBA's songs, despite having disbanded in 1982, still play on and are known by a rather large audience. We've all probably heard the music. The notion of a musical written around this music, I will admit, both horrified and intrigued me. On the one hand, it sounds like a hopelessly stupid scheme to pass as a musical; on the other hand, the music is rather nostalgic and, in its time, it was rather innovative. I think the beginning of the musical itself actually capitalized on these sentiments. A faceless voice over the sound system made the typical announcements for live theatre (regarding no flash photography, recording devices, or cell phones and other electronic devices in use) but added something like this, "A fair warning to our patrons: White spandex and platform boots will be in use during the performance!" It was certainly loads of fun to hear the songs done live. Until last night I had only heard the songs on the radio or on CD. But, what really surprised me was that there is really a story, a legitimate plot to the show. Granted, the plot may be a bit thin, but it wasn't nearly as thin as I had anticipated. There was minor tragedy, conflict, and resolution. And the writers really were clever at how they incorporated ABBA songs into the script. In addition, the very simple set was superbly employed and the actors themselves moved props and helped change scenes in a manner that can only be described as part of the choreography for the show (only done with low lighting). All in all, it was very enjoyable and clever. It certainly won't stand the test of time as memorable drama and -- I pray -- generations from now won't look back on us and see "Mamma Mia!" and the likes as what we ourselves viewed as normative theatre. I admit, I am a bit worried about this sign of our cultural times because "Mamma Mia!" is not the only musical out there incorporating pop songs. We shall see.... I'll let Fr. Tharp add any more details about the show that he might want to share.
Tonight was a very heavy drama about the genocide in Rwanda in 1994. It was an excellent film based on historical events that told the real life story of a man in the midst of this sadly real human drama. The film captured the atrocity and the weight of the tragedy without showing gratuitous violence and without being oppressively bloody. In the midst of the ugliness of the tragedy, the beauty of human goodness was also visible (reminds me somewhat of "The Passion of the Christ"). I think the lead actor (I don't remember his name) performed exceedingly well. As an African man he was very much involved in, and overwhelmed by, the events of the unrest in his country. But the movie also showed how his role as the manager of a hotel-turned-refugee-camp placed on him a certain duty or role that he had to play -- a certain facade he had to keep up -- in order to bring some sense of stability to terribly frightened people. Ultimately, of course, this was a role he played to save lives. It was gripping film. It made me think about the larger connections we all ought to know and feel as members of the human race. It made me think how easy it is to see such terrible storied on the news and to go on, leading my daily life with little impact or even thought to the depth of human tragedy in other parts of the world.
I would highly recommend "Hotel Rwanda" to anyone and, should "Mamma Mia!" come to your town, I think you would enjoy a little 70's flashback!
Tuesday, March 08, 2005
Notice to Television Executives, et al.
You are likely playing with fire (read: eternal fire (read: damnation)) with programs such as Medium and others!
The Liturgy of the Hours today has a selection from Leviticus, which prompted me to do some biblical research and to open the corresponding section of the Catechism. Leviticus 19:31 reads:
"Do not go to mediums or consult fortune-tellers, for you will be defiled by them. I, the Lord, am your God."
The Catechism goes on to develop this divine injunction:
"Divination and magic
2115 "God can reveal the future to his prophets or to other saints. Still, a sound Christian attitude consists in putting oneself confidently into the hands of Providence for whatever concerns the future, and giving up all unhealthy curiosity about it. Improvidence, however, can constitute a lack of responsibility.
2116 "All forms of divination are to be rejected: recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to "unveil" the future.48 Consulting horoscopes, astrology, palm reading, interpretation of omens and lots, the phenomena of clairvoyance, and recourse to mediums all conceal a desire for power over time, history, and, in the last analysis, other human beings, as well as a wish to conciliate hidden powers. They contradict the honor, respect, and loving fear that we owe to God alone.
2117 "All practices of magic or sorcery, by which one attempts to tame occult powers, so as to place them at one's service and have a supernatural power over others—even if this were for the sake of restoring their health—are gravely contrary to the virtue of religion. These practices are even more to be condemned when accompanied by the intention of harming someone, or when they have recourse to the intervention of demons. Wearing charms is also reprehensible. Spiritism often implies divination or magical practices; the Church for her part warns the faithful against it. Recourse to so-called traditional cures does not justify either the invocation of evil powers or the exploitation of another's credulity."
So, consider yourselves warned. Do not seek power apart from God Himself and do not have recourse to "forces" other than a confident, filial trust in God's providential care for us, His children.
You are likely playing with fire (read: eternal fire (read: damnation)) with programs such as Medium and others!
The Liturgy of the Hours today has a selection from Leviticus, which prompted me to do some biblical research and to open the corresponding section of the Catechism. Leviticus 19:31 reads:
"Do not go to mediums or consult fortune-tellers, for you will be defiled by them. I, the Lord, am your God."
The Catechism goes on to develop this divine injunction:
"Divination and magic
2115 "God can reveal the future to his prophets or to other saints. Still, a sound Christian attitude consists in putting oneself confidently into the hands of Providence for whatever concerns the future, and giving up all unhealthy curiosity about it. Improvidence, however, can constitute a lack of responsibility.
2116 "All forms of divination are to be rejected: recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to "unveil" the future.48 Consulting horoscopes, astrology, palm reading, interpretation of omens and lots, the phenomena of clairvoyance, and recourse to mediums all conceal a desire for power over time, history, and, in the last analysis, other human beings, as well as a wish to conciliate hidden powers. They contradict the honor, respect, and loving fear that we owe to God alone.
2117 "All practices of magic or sorcery, by which one attempts to tame occult powers, so as to place them at one's service and have a supernatural power over others—even if this were for the sake of restoring their health—are gravely contrary to the virtue of religion. These practices are even more to be condemned when accompanied by the intention of harming someone, or when they have recourse to the intervention of demons. Wearing charms is also reprehensible. Spiritism often implies divination or magical practices; the Church for her part warns the faithful against it. Recourse to so-called traditional cures does not justify either the invocation of evil powers or the exploitation of another's credulity."
So, consider yourselves warned. Do not seek power apart from God Himself and do not have recourse to "forces" other than a confident, filial trust in God's providential care for us, His children.
Liturgical Footnote #6
By Fr. J.C. Garrett
After the more somber tone of the Penitential Rite in which we recall our sinfulness and ask God’s mercy and forgiveness, the whole mode of the Mass changes rather dramatically as all present burst out in the Gloria. “The Gloria is a very ancient and venerable hymn in which the Church, gathered together in the Holy Spirit, glorifies and entreats God the Father and the Lamb” (GIRM #53). This is a triumphant hymn of great joy for the redemption we have received. In the Gloria, using snatches from Scripture, we praise Jesus who, like the scapegoat in the Old Testament, has taken on the burden of sin of the enter world and has set us free.
By Fr. J.C. Garrett
After the more somber tone of the Penitential Rite in which we recall our sinfulness and ask God’s mercy and forgiveness, the whole mode of the Mass changes rather dramatically as all present burst out in the Gloria. “The Gloria is a very ancient and venerable hymn in which the Church, gathered together in the Holy Spirit, glorifies and entreats God the Father and the Lamb” (GIRM #53). This is a triumphant hymn of great joy for the redemption we have received. In the Gloria, using snatches from Scripture, we praise Jesus who, like the scapegoat in the Old Testament, has taken on the burden of sin of the enter world and has set us free.
As a hymn, it is preferred that the Gloria be sung; and always with joy! The text of the Gloria may never be replaced with some other text (GIRM #53). If the Gloria is not sung, it is to be recited by the priest and congregation together. It is always to be sung or said on solemnities and feasts, and on all Sundays outside the seasons of Advent and Lent. “Because of the triumphalist joy of the Gloria, it is omitted completely when the whole Mass is of a penitential or simple character, in Advent and Lent and on ordinary weekdays” (Fr. Francis Randolph, Know Him in the Breaking of the Bread: A Guide to the Mass, Ignatius Press, p. 59).
Monday, March 07, 2005
Some Random Thoughts on Church Architecture
I mentioned in my "I'm Back" post that during my vacation to Williamsburg, VA I had the opportunity to visit two new churches, and that I would make some comments about the architecture. First allow me to make this caveat: I AM NOT AN ARCHITECT, Jim ( ala Dr. McCoy for all you Star Trek fans). My advance degrees are in Counseling Psychology and Theology. The Theology degrees give me some understanding of ecclesiology, which should be somewhat reflected in church architecture, as well as having me read some documents on the subject, so the following is my somewhat education but FAR from expert opinion. Agree or disagree with me as you want, as long as we keep it charitable.
The one parish I visited was St. Bede parish in Williamsburg, VA, and the other was Immaculate Conception BVM parish in Birdsboro, PA (where I picked up my priest friend). Both are not new parishes persay, rather both where parishes which outgrew their current facilities and built new ones. I think this is an important distinction because this means that each parish had a history, people in the past had donated funds and items for the original churches, so there was something of a legacy to perserve.
St. Bede's was still being worked on when my friend and I visited it, but they were clearly already using it for worship. The day we visited the big project was installing a very large organ. The church is designed in the round. Personally, I do not care for churches in the round, but I recognize that this is a traditional design for churches. From what I read, ideally in a church in the round the central focus of the design should be the Altar of sacrifice. When we first entered St. Bede's there was a large "gathering space" (I still prefer the term narthax) and off to the sides were a couple of hallways with offices (presumably for the parish). I even noticed a kitchen. On either side of the main doors into the church itself were some legacy artwork from the original church: one was a wood carving (I think they call it something like a redoube) with the Trinity and the BVM. It had a high Middle Ages/English design to it, and was very beautiful. Opposite to it was a large, iconish painting of the life of St. Bede; also very traditional and very beautiful. Then we entered the church. As should be the question whenever you enter a church, we both asked ourselves, "Where's Jesus?" In other words, "Where is the tabernacle?" Certainly our eyes did not quickly spy where they had taken our Lord. While the Altar was in the center of the circle, it was dwarfed by the HUGE organ they were installing. Clearly the central focus of this "worship space" was the music. While I love beautiful, liturgical music (and I am not sure that would be the type of music offered at St. Bede's) it is a creation of Man, the creature. We turned to our left, and there behind us to the left, in a room all to Himself, with a nice window to the church, was our Lord. If there was stain glass it was hardly memorable. The ceiling of the church seemed low, certainly no real vertical dimension to lift our spirits upwards towards heaven. While not the ugliest church that I have ever seen, it was just another very forgetable modern church that hardly inspired any sense of the sacred. With very little modification you could turn it into a lecture hall or performance hall. As we turned to leave we noticed the final "insult" -- a "feel good" incipid "Covenant" with the local Lutheran parish, basically pledging friendship and joint worship opportunities. Parishioners were encouraged to go to the "covenant" partner parish for some Sunday worship. No mention was given that it would not suffice for the Catholic's Sunday obligation. Disappointing is to state things very mildly.
At the end of the vacation, when I dropped my friend back at his parish, we went to the new parish complex that is being built. The school and the church are complete, and they are finishing the rectory and parish office. The parish is named Immaculate Conception BVM, and I am connecting a link to some photos of the church. In my humble opinion, simply put, this represents some of the best in contemporary church design. While it is true that the granite and marble masterpieces of the past are probably not possible for most parishes (both economically and practically because so much of the artisans needed no longer exist), it does not mean that just because you have to use more affordable and available materials that the church has to be ugly. Immaculate Conception BVM sits about 900, so it is big, but at the same time it does not feel as if people are sitting a far distance from the altar. It is a cruciform design (OK, I prefer that so it might have made me a bit more positively disposed). There is a good size narthax in the back. For first thing I noticed was that the church had some color. Too often, IMHO, modern churches have dark earthtones. While some may disagree with the choice of color (the walls of the main church were something of a peach color, though in two shades, and the tabernacle was in space with what I thought was a very nice dark red), I thought it was nice. The first thing you notice is the huge crucifix which is hanging right over the Altar of Sacrifice. It is very nice, though I think a tad too big -- reduce it 20% and I think it would still be significant but not over dominanting. Next you noticed the very nice baptismal fount at the back of the church. I did not get the full history of the fount, so I am not sure if it is new, used or from the original parish. It does have what seems to be part of an old altar rail around it. It is marble and very classic in design. A closer look at the Altar shows that it is designed in the same pattern as the baptismal fount. The church has nice wooden pews, on a tile floor. The ceiling is high. The stations of the Cross are mosaics, and I am told that they were originally in a church that was closed. The stain glass windows were from a closed parish in Philadelphia, and of a craftsmanship that is hard to find today. Since they wanted larger windows, the original stain glass windows are surrounded by what looks to be blown, white glass borders. In the four "corners" of the where the arms of the cruciform comes together they have alcoves for four statues of saints. I was informed that they are the same saints whose statues were in the original church, although the statues themselves are new. There are devotional candles infront of each alcove. There are two huge stained glass windows in the center part of the church (where the "arms" are), also classic designs from a closed parish in Philadelphia. Behind the main Altar there is a beautiful grill, behind which is a big tabernacle tower of marble with a lovely tabernacle. I am told that the tower and tabernacle was from usedchurchgoods.com, a site that "rescues" church art from churches that are closed, mostly from Europe. So while the main part of the church was of contemporary materials (the walls, floors, etc.) there was enough classic church art to tie the church to the tradition. The lighting is modern, but excellent; designed to call attention to the particular worship happening in the church. In other words there was a setting for "between Masses", another for "Weekday Masses", one for "Adoration" (almost all dark, with spots on the Altar where the Monsterance would be), and then very bright for Sundays and Solemnities. I was hugely impressed, and cannot wait for my friend to put even more photos of the church on the parish website. Truly a testament that modern churches can invoke a deep sense of the sacred was still being affordable.
I mentioned in my "I'm Back" post that during my vacation to Williamsburg, VA I had the opportunity to visit two new churches, and that I would make some comments about the architecture. First allow me to make this caveat: I AM NOT AN ARCHITECT, Jim ( ala Dr. McCoy for all you Star Trek fans). My advance degrees are in Counseling Psychology and Theology. The Theology degrees give me some understanding of ecclesiology, which should be somewhat reflected in church architecture, as well as having me read some documents on the subject, so the following is my somewhat education but FAR from expert opinion. Agree or disagree with me as you want, as long as we keep it charitable.
The one parish I visited was St. Bede parish in Williamsburg, VA, and the other was Immaculate Conception BVM parish in Birdsboro, PA (where I picked up my priest friend). Both are not new parishes persay, rather both where parishes which outgrew their current facilities and built new ones. I think this is an important distinction because this means that each parish had a history, people in the past had donated funds and items for the original churches, so there was something of a legacy to perserve.
St. Bede's was still being worked on when my friend and I visited it, but they were clearly already using it for worship. The day we visited the big project was installing a very large organ. The church is designed in the round. Personally, I do not care for churches in the round, but I recognize that this is a traditional design for churches. From what I read, ideally in a church in the round the central focus of the design should be the Altar of sacrifice. When we first entered St. Bede's there was a large "gathering space" (I still prefer the term narthax) and off to the sides were a couple of hallways with offices (presumably for the parish). I even noticed a kitchen. On either side of the main doors into the church itself were some legacy artwork from the original church: one was a wood carving (I think they call it something like a redoube) with the Trinity and the BVM. It had a high Middle Ages/English design to it, and was very beautiful. Opposite to it was a large, iconish painting of the life of St. Bede; also very traditional and very beautiful. Then we entered the church. As should be the question whenever you enter a church, we both asked ourselves, "Where's Jesus?" In other words, "Where is the tabernacle?" Certainly our eyes did not quickly spy where they had taken our Lord. While the Altar was in the center of the circle, it was dwarfed by the HUGE organ they were installing. Clearly the central focus of this "worship space" was the music. While I love beautiful, liturgical music (and I am not sure that would be the type of music offered at St. Bede's) it is a creation of Man, the creature. We turned to our left, and there behind us to the left, in a room all to Himself, with a nice window to the church, was our Lord. If there was stain glass it was hardly memorable. The ceiling of the church seemed low, certainly no real vertical dimension to lift our spirits upwards towards heaven. While not the ugliest church that I have ever seen, it was just another very forgetable modern church that hardly inspired any sense of the sacred. With very little modification you could turn it into a lecture hall or performance hall. As we turned to leave we noticed the final "insult" -- a "feel good" incipid "Covenant" with the local Lutheran parish, basically pledging friendship and joint worship opportunities. Parishioners were encouraged to go to the "covenant" partner parish for some Sunday worship. No mention was given that it would not suffice for the Catholic's Sunday obligation. Disappointing is to state things very mildly.
At the end of the vacation, when I dropped my friend back at his parish, we went to the new parish complex that is being built. The school and the church are complete, and they are finishing the rectory and parish office. The parish is named Immaculate Conception BVM, and I am connecting a link to some photos of the church. In my humble opinion, simply put, this represents some of the best in contemporary church design. While it is true that the granite and marble masterpieces of the past are probably not possible for most parishes (both economically and practically because so much of the artisans needed no longer exist), it does not mean that just because you have to use more affordable and available materials that the church has to be ugly. Immaculate Conception BVM sits about 900, so it is big, but at the same time it does not feel as if people are sitting a far distance from the altar. It is a cruciform design (OK, I prefer that so it might have made me a bit more positively disposed). There is a good size narthax in the back. For first thing I noticed was that the church had some color. Too often, IMHO, modern churches have dark earthtones. While some may disagree with the choice of color (the walls of the main church were something of a peach color, though in two shades, and the tabernacle was in space with what I thought was a very nice dark red), I thought it was nice. The first thing you notice is the huge crucifix which is hanging right over the Altar of Sacrifice. It is very nice, though I think a tad too big -- reduce it 20% and I think it would still be significant but not over dominanting. Next you noticed the very nice baptismal fount at the back of the church. I did not get the full history of the fount, so I am not sure if it is new, used or from the original parish. It does have what seems to be part of an old altar rail around it. It is marble and very classic in design. A closer look at the Altar shows that it is designed in the same pattern as the baptismal fount. The church has nice wooden pews, on a tile floor. The ceiling is high. The stations of the Cross are mosaics, and I am told that they were originally in a church that was closed. The stain glass windows were from a closed parish in Philadelphia, and of a craftsmanship that is hard to find today. Since they wanted larger windows, the original stain glass windows are surrounded by what looks to be blown, white glass borders. In the four "corners" of the where the arms of the cruciform comes together they have alcoves for four statues of saints. I was informed that they are the same saints whose statues were in the original church, although the statues themselves are new. There are devotional candles infront of each alcove. There are two huge stained glass windows in the center part of the church (where the "arms" are), also classic designs from a closed parish in Philadelphia. Behind the main Altar there is a beautiful grill, behind which is a big tabernacle tower of marble with a lovely tabernacle. I am told that the tower and tabernacle was from usedchurchgoods.com, a site that "rescues" church art from churches that are closed, mostly from Europe. So while the main part of the church was of contemporary materials (the walls, floors, etc.) there was enough classic church art to tie the church to the tradition. The lighting is modern, but excellent; designed to call attention to the particular worship happening in the church. In other words there was a setting for "between Masses", another for "Weekday Masses", one for "Adoration" (almost all dark, with spots on the Altar where the Monsterance would be), and then very bright for Sundays and Solemnities. I was hugely impressed, and cannot wait for my friend to put even more photos of the church on the parish website. Truly a testament that modern churches can invoke a deep sense of the sacred was still being affordable.
How Utterly Fitting

You are 'Latin'. Even among obsolete skills, the
tongue of the ancient Romans is a real
anachronism. With its profusion of different
cases and conjugations, Latin is more than a
language; it is a whole different way of
thinking about things.
You are very classy, meaning that you value the
classics. You value old things, good things
which have stood the test of time. You value
things which have been proven worthy and
valuable, even if no one else these days sees
them that way. Your life is touched by a
certain 'pietas', or piety; perhaps you are
even a Stoic. Nonetheless, you have a certain
fascination with the grotesque and the profane.
Also, the modern world rejects you like a bad
transplant. Your problem is that Latin has
been obsolete for a long time.
What obsolete skill are you?
brought to you by Quizilla

You are 'Latin'. Even among obsolete skills, the
tongue of the ancient Romans is a real
anachronism. With its profusion of different
cases and conjugations, Latin is more than a
language; it is a whole different way of
thinking about things.
You are very classy, meaning that you value the
classics. You value old things, good things
which have stood the test of time. You value
things which have been proven worthy and
valuable, even if no one else these days sees
them that way. Your life is touched by a
certain 'pietas', or piety; perhaps you are
even a Stoic. Nonetheless, you have a certain
fascination with the grotesque and the profane.
Also, the modern world rejects you like a bad
transplant. Your problem is that Latin has
been obsolete for a long time.
What obsolete skill are you?
brought to you by Quizilla
Rose day ... liturgically speaking
Shucks ... only the second time the liturgy allows the use of Rose-colored vestments has come and gone for another liturgical year. The characteristic of joy is highlighted on Laetare Sunday, the Fourth Sunday of Lent. The lighter color vesture serves as a reminder that we are more than halfway through Lent, approaching the great feast of Christ our Light (the Resurrection), and that joy and repentance are not mutually exclusive traits for the Christian. We can, and should, be joyful in the midst of our penances, in the midst of the simplified and somber season of Lent, because we are being drawn closer to Christ and renewed in his likeness! How could we not be joyful? Laetare Sunday, now past, reminds us that this season of penance and conversion is joyful, indeed, as one of the Lenten prefaces states (perhaps that has sounded awkwardly in our ears if we have heard it before): "Lord, each year you give us this joyful season..."
Sometimes, due to having ashes smeared on our heads, reflecting on our sinfulness, and struggling with our unruly body's demand for the thing given up for Lent, we forget how joyful we should be that Christ freely bestows on us his grace that our baptismal dignity may be restored!
Shucks ... only the second time the liturgy allows the use of Rose-colored vestments has come and gone for another liturgical year. The characteristic of joy is highlighted on Laetare Sunday, the Fourth Sunday of Lent. The lighter color vesture serves as a reminder that we are more than halfway through Lent, approaching the great feast of Christ our Light (the Resurrection), and that joy and repentance are not mutually exclusive traits for the Christian. We can, and should, be joyful in the midst of our penances, in the midst of the simplified and somber season of Lent, because we are being drawn closer to Christ and renewed in his likeness! How could we not be joyful? Laetare Sunday, now past, reminds us that this season of penance and conversion is joyful, indeed, as one of the Lenten prefaces states (perhaps that has sounded awkwardly in our ears if we have heard it before): "Lord, each year you give us this joyful season..."
Sometimes, due to having ashes smeared on our heads, reflecting on our sinfulness, and struggling with our unruly body's demand for the thing given up for Lent, we forget how joyful we should be that Christ freely bestows on us his grace that our baptismal dignity may be restored!
Sunday, March 06, 2005
Laetare Sunday (The Fourth Sunday of Lent), Year A
Readings: I Samuel 16:1b, 6-7, 10-13a; Psalm 23; Ephesians 5:8-14; John 9:1-41
Most of us know the unique torture that is a bad case of flu. You can feel it come on; you can feel your strength go away until you are too weak to anything more vigorous that watch TV. Then, that happy day comes, when you recognize that you are on the mend. You aren't well, but you aren't going to get sicker. That is what this Sunday of Lent is like.
The Fourth Sunday of Lent is traditionally called Laetare Sunday. It is a Sunday in which to rejoice but at the same time, knowing that Lent isn't over. We haven't reached Easter, but we can see it coming. This Sunday brings us to examine our sources of joy. Joy is different from happiness, but it might be hard to see.
When we think of David, we normally put him at the end of the journey of his life, crowned as King of Israel and Uniter of the Kingdom. His Kingdom is a reflection of the Heavenly Kingdom. He gives us the first transitory taste. In today's first reading, however, the story is completely the opposite. Here, we see the runt of the litter, from a family with little or no influence, from a family with no money or power, elevated to the office of King. What's the underlying message? The only reason David is King of Israel is because God chose him to be.
When we encounter the man born blind, we deal with someone else who is also an absolute nothing, from the world's perspective. Being blind means you are as good as dead. You couldn't take care of yourself; you were unproductive. Compound this with the fact his being born blind creates the stigma that somehow a MAJOR SINNER has caused this to happen. That's the background to the behavior of both the disciples and the Pharisees. When Jesus heals this man's blindness, we see the catestrophic reversal for the goods of the world. This man is not the most forgotten by God; this man has been watched and tended by God for this hour of healing. The man born blind, and other like him, are most especially God's possession.
What do these two men have in common? Both of these men are lowly. They have no other resource to defend themselves, except for the intervention of God. The shocking fact is God spends a heck of a lot of time dealing with the lowly. The powerful don't seem to be on the radar; they probably aren't on the radar because they have used their wealth, fame, and power to cloak their movements and cloak their hearts from God.
This brings us to a question about ourselves. If I were to ask for a show of hands of those who consider themselves lowly or would want to be lowly, I don't think I would get many takers. (N.B. When I preached this, I phrased it as "Raise your hand if..." Nobody raised their hands.) We like to present ourselves and all together in charge. However, when we are alone, the truth pushes back on this facade of self-reliance. We are forced to say, "I am lowly because I am sick. I am lowly because I can't pay my bills. I am lowly because I sin." Over and over again, lowliness presents itself as the more truthful state of affairs.
Here then is the secret of Joy. Joy comes from lowliness. It comes from knowing that no matter how disregarded or discarded we are by the world, God never neglects the lowly. He sustains; therefore, we can always hold out hope, and that hope leads to joy. Happiness vanishes all too readily. Happiness from physical beauty vanishes with the first wrinkle. Happiness from a beautiful car vanishes the moment a deer bolts out into road. Happiness from wealth vanishes the moment the stock market crashes.
My pastor when I became a Catholic had a classic line, "Happiness is over rated." I agree. Only those whose blindness has been removed by the waters of baptism, can see that happiness flees, but joy endures.
Readings: I Samuel 16:1b, 6-7, 10-13a; Psalm 23; Ephesians 5:8-14; John 9:1-41
Most of us know the unique torture that is a bad case of flu. You can feel it come on; you can feel your strength go away until you are too weak to anything more vigorous that watch TV. Then, that happy day comes, when you recognize that you are on the mend. You aren't well, but you aren't going to get sicker. That is what this Sunday of Lent is like.
The Fourth Sunday of Lent is traditionally called Laetare Sunday. It is a Sunday in which to rejoice but at the same time, knowing that Lent isn't over. We haven't reached Easter, but we can see it coming. This Sunday brings us to examine our sources of joy. Joy is different from happiness, but it might be hard to see.
When we think of David, we normally put him at the end of the journey of his life, crowned as King of Israel and Uniter of the Kingdom. His Kingdom is a reflection of the Heavenly Kingdom. He gives us the first transitory taste. In today's first reading, however, the story is completely the opposite. Here, we see the runt of the litter, from a family with little or no influence, from a family with no money or power, elevated to the office of King. What's the underlying message? The only reason David is King of Israel is because God chose him to be.
When we encounter the man born blind, we deal with someone else who is also an absolute nothing, from the world's perspective. Being blind means you are as good as dead. You couldn't take care of yourself; you were unproductive. Compound this with the fact his being born blind creates the stigma that somehow a MAJOR SINNER has caused this to happen. That's the background to the behavior of both the disciples and the Pharisees. When Jesus heals this man's blindness, we see the catestrophic reversal for the goods of the world. This man is not the most forgotten by God; this man has been watched and tended by God for this hour of healing. The man born blind, and other like him, are most especially God's possession.
What do these two men have in common? Both of these men are lowly. They have no other resource to defend themselves, except for the intervention of God. The shocking fact is God spends a heck of a lot of time dealing with the lowly. The powerful don't seem to be on the radar; they probably aren't on the radar because they have used their wealth, fame, and power to cloak their movements and cloak their hearts from God.
This brings us to a question about ourselves. If I were to ask for a show of hands of those who consider themselves lowly or would want to be lowly, I don't think I would get many takers. (N.B. When I preached this, I phrased it as "Raise your hand if..." Nobody raised their hands.) We like to present ourselves and all together in charge. However, when we are alone, the truth pushes back on this facade of self-reliance. We are forced to say, "I am lowly because I am sick. I am lowly because I can't pay my bills. I am lowly because I sin." Over and over again, lowliness presents itself as the more truthful state of affairs.
Here then is the secret of Joy. Joy comes from lowliness. It comes from knowing that no matter how disregarded or discarded we are by the world, God never neglects the lowly. He sustains; therefore, we can always hold out hope, and that hope leads to joy. Happiness vanishes all too readily. Happiness from physical beauty vanishes with the first wrinkle. Happiness from a beautiful car vanishes the moment a deer bolts out into road. Happiness from wealth vanishes the moment the stock market crashes.
My pastor when I became a Catholic had a classic line, "Happiness is over rated." I agree. Only those whose blindness has been removed by the waters of baptism, can see that happiness flees, but joy endures.
Saturday, March 05, 2005
Beautiful and Delicious
Just when you can't imagine a more interesting use for someone's melons...and get your minds out of the gutter.
Just when you can't imagine a more interesting use for someone's melons...and get your minds out of the gutter.
In communion with St. Peter's successor
We had a special First Saturday Mass this morning for the Pope. It was fairly well attended. Given the Pope's latest hospitalizations and his weakness, I figured it would be a good idea to have a special parish Mass for him. It was good to join the Church universal in praying for our beloved Holy Father who has so faithfully confirmed the brethren in the faith and has been the rock solid foundation of the Church's unity.
We had a special First Saturday Mass this morning for the Pope. It was fairly well attended. Given the Pope's latest hospitalizations and his weakness, I figured it would be a good idea to have a special parish Mass for him. It was good to join the Church universal in praying for our beloved Holy Father who has so faithfully confirmed the brethren in the faith and has been the rock solid foundation of the Church's unity.
I've got you, Babe...
I couldn't find a good link for this news item, but apparently Cher is suing a company owned by Time/Warner for back royalties that have gone unpaid for the past few years. I suggest the executives of the production studios begin singing Cher's "If I Could Turn Back Time" as a sign of their regret for dissing Cher.
And I really hope that things won't turn ugly for Fr. Tharp, too, for his unroyaltied use of "I've Got You, Babe" at his parish weddings!
I couldn't find a good link for this news item, but apparently Cher is suing a company owned by Time/Warner for back royalties that have gone unpaid for the past few years. I suggest the executives of the production studios begin singing Cher's "If I Could Turn Back Time" as a sign of their regret for dissing Cher.
And I really hope that things won't turn ugly for Fr. Tharp, too, for his unroyaltied use of "I've Got You, Babe" at his parish weddings!
Opening Night
Last night was the opening night of "Annie" at the Guymon Community Theatre. It was one of the best opening nights attendance-wise in recent years. And the show went very well. I was able to pastorally attend the parish fish fry, attend Stations of the Cross and assist the associate pastor (who lead Stations) with Benediction at the conclusion, and then, put on my costume and get over to the theatre with plenty of time to spare (my brief scene is at the start of Act II). The schedule works out nicely, especially on Saturday nights when I have Mass first and still have time to get over to the theatre.
Everyone seemed to enjoy the show and I know I enjoyed being involved in it. I think the brief cameo role is the perfect role, generally speaking. You get the benefits of being a cast member and enjoying the excitement, without the anxiety of being on stage the whole time and having to memorize endless lines. There was a day when I was gunning for the lead roles; but, not anymore, thanks be to God!
Last night was the opening night of "Annie" at the Guymon Community Theatre. It was one of the best opening nights attendance-wise in recent years. And the show went very well. I was able to pastorally attend the parish fish fry, attend Stations of the Cross and assist the associate pastor (who lead Stations) with Benediction at the conclusion, and then, put on my costume and get over to the theatre with plenty of time to spare (my brief scene is at the start of Act II). The schedule works out nicely, especially on Saturday nights when I have Mass first and still have time to get over to the theatre.
Everyone seemed to enjoy the show and I know I enjoyed being involved in it. I think the brief cameo role is the perfect role, generally speaking. You get the benefits of being a cast member and enjoying the excitement, without the anxiety of being on stage the whole time and having to memorize endless lines. There was a day when I was gunning for the lead roles; but, not anymore, thanks be to God!
Friday, March 04, 2005
It's All So Blessed- Damian-of-Molokai-esque
I have a good friend named Grace Gallagher who lives and works with Hispanic seminarians in the Diocese of Puero Plata, Dominican Republic. If that were not enough she also helps to coordinate funds and support for various charitable enterprises in the DR. Her activities remind me so much of the work of Blessed Damian of Molokai. Blessed Damian, before preaching the Gospel in words, built housing and improved sanitation conditions on the island. In essence, he preached with his hands as much as with words. In the end, he shared every sorrow they did. He shared in the death of leprosy. The only part of him that was unaffected were his fingertips where he held the Sacred Host.
Take this as a lesson, faithful readers. We do as much with a strong back and charity to promote the Gospel as clever well formed arguments might achieve.
If you are interested in helping Ms. Gallagher with this work you can contact her at Mustard Seed.
I have a good friend named Grace Gallagher who lives and works with Hispanic seminarians in the Diocese of Puero Plata, Dominican Republic. If that were not enough she also helps to coordinate funds and support for various charitable enterprises in the DR. Her activities remind me so much of the work of Blessed Damian of Molokai. Blessed Damian, before preaching the Gospel in words, built housing and improved sanitation conditions on the island. In essence, he preached with his hands as much as with words. In the end, he shared every sorrow they did. He shared in the death of leprosy. The only part of him that was unaffected were his fingertips where he held the Sacred Host.
Take this as a lesson, faithful readers. We do as much with a strong back and charity to promote the Gospel as clever well formed arguments might achieve.
If you are interested in helping Ms. Gallagher with this work you can contact her at Mustard Seed.
Some Addictive Fun . . . though not Politically Correct.
My sister's father-in-law sent me this link which I have found very amusing. The instructions are simple; click once to get the penguin to jump, click a second time to get the Yeti to swing, and see how far you can go.
My sister's father-in-law sent me this link which I have found very amusing. The instructions are simple; click once to get the penguin to jump, click a second time to get the Yeti to swing, and see how far you can go.
Thursday, March 03, 2005
Even More Separated at Birth
Readers know of my pechant for noting when other folks who think like me and act like me end up looking a lot like me. You can consider my previous observation about the similarity between myself and Mark Shea. Well, after my interview today, we have found another "brother from another mother."
You can compare first, my very small visage in the upper right of the column. I am the one in the black shirt.
Here's Sean Herriot, one of the hosts of Morning Air:

However, much to her credit, Sally Robb, the other host of Morning Air, looks nothing like me:

(Isn't she as cute as a button?)
The jury is still out on whether or not their news voice, Glen Lewerenz, fits the bill:
Readers know of my pechant for noting when other folks who think like me and act like me end up looking a lot like me. You can consider my previous observation about the similarity between myself and Mark Shea. Well, after my interview today, we have found another "brother from another mother."
You can compare first, my very small visage in the upper right of the column. I am the one in the black shirt.
Here's Sean Herriot, one of the hosts of Morning Air:

However, much to her credit, Sally Robb, the other host of Morning Air, looks nothing like me:

(Isn't she as cute as a button?)
The jury is still out on whether or not their news voice, Glen Lewerenz, fits the bill:
Edmond Middle School Students Return After Evacuation
This may explain why Techmonkey Dave was looking for some tools and plumbing implements...
This may explain why Techmonkey Dave was looking for some tools and plumbing implements...
All Said and Done
Ahhhh....That cyber-sigh comes from the depths of my soul. The interview is over. I don't think that I made a boob of myself, but others will have to judge that. I think we will have a segment link available soon, but you can catch the replay of the show tonight, from 6-9 p.m. I think that the interview will be on from 8:00-8:30 p.m., but quite frankly, you should listen to the whole show.
Ahhhh....That cyber-sigh comes from the depths of my soul. The interview is over. I don't think that I made a boob of myself, but others will have to judge that. I think we will have a segment link available soon, but you can catch the replay of the show tonight, from 6-9 p.m. I think that the interview will be on from 8:00-8:30 p.m., but quite frankly, you should listen to the whole show.
Well, I wanted to get the attention of Cardinal Pell...
Last afternoon, I got back to the parish after a couple of days of business in Oklahoma City. On Sunday, I had my regular 3rd Order Dominican Meeting which was wonderful. I gave a little lecture on how to pray the Liturgy of the Hours, and accordingly Evening Prayer went much more smoothly. On Monday, I took part in the UCO Catholic College Students Fundraiser. This project began under the leadership of Fr. Hamilton when he was the parochial vicar at St. John's in Edmond. The fundraiser consists in a prominent speaker lecturing and a dinner before it. This year's speaker, Dr. Teresa Burke, the creator of the Rachel's Vineyard Retreat, blew people away with the facts about abortion's occurance and the aftermath of abortion. On Tuesday, I sat down and tried to chew through my jugular vein as I attended a Business Meeting for the Priests of the Archdiocese. In truth, it was rendered much more pleasant by having dinner with beloved brother priests, especially my fellow blogger, Fr. H. Also, we came up with an exciting idea, we that is the dinner group, but more on that later.
As I was saying, I returned to the parish yesterday and found a packet from The Record, the diocesan newspaper from Perth in Western Austrailia. Apparently, the paper did a cover piece on CRM and the review was very favorable. However, I forgot to ask for copies for Fr. H and Fr. G, so if the editor is reading this, send me an email so that I can give you their addresses and they can have a copy as well. As for me, I will be slicing this out and having it framed. I am not sure if the article will bring accolades from Cardinal Pell, but we will see.
There was one interesting paragraph that I wanted to share with you all. The unnamed author writes:
Last afternoon, I got back to the parish after a couple of days of business in Oklahoma City. On Sunday, I had my regular 3rd Order Dominican Meeting which was wonderful. I gave a little lecture on how to pray the Liturgy of the Hours, and accordingly Evening Prayer went much more smoothly. On Monday, I took part in the UCO Catholic College Students Fundraiser. This project began under the leadership of Fr. Hamilton when he was the parochial vicar at St. John's in Edmond. The fundraiser consists in a prominent speaker lecturing and a dinner before it. This year's speaker, Dr. Teresa Burke, the creator of the Rachel's Vineyard Retreat, blew people away with the facts about abortion's occurance and the aftermath of abortion. On Tuesday, I sat down and tried to chew through my jugular vein as I attended a Business Meeting for the Priests of the Archdiocese. In truth, it was rendered much more pleasant by having dinner with beloved brother priests, especially my fellow blogger, Fr. H. Also, we came up with an exciting idea, we that is the dinner group, but more on that later.
As I was saying, I returned to the parish yesterday and found a packet from The Record, the diocesan newspaper from Perth in Western Austrailia. Apparently, the paper did a cover piece on CRM and the review was very favorable. However, I forgot to ask for copies for Fr. H and Fr. G, so if the editor is reading this, send me an email so that I can give you their addresses and they can have a copy as well. As for me, I will be slicing this out and having it framed. I am not sure if the article will bring accolades from Cardinal Pell, but we will see.
There was one interesting paragraph that I wanted to share with you all. The unnamed author writes:
Another interesting aspect of what they are doing, although I'm not sure that this was specifically their intention, is that when orders such as the Dominicans first started out they went out into the highways and byways, the markest and the pubs and places like these to preach the Gospel of Jesus. Today, I wonder where are we, as Catholics, doing this? A place called Almost Precious Nowhere, is my guess. But one possible answer is the Internet; it is in many ways, the marketplace of ideas for the 21st century.To answer these questions, 1.) yes, there was that intention in the blog's origin. Techmonkey Dave, once the blog really hit, said, "What you are doing in the quintessence of the New Evangelization." 2.) Given my third order status, isn't that interesting that he compared the blog to the work of the Dominicans. If I find that the article is available online, I will link it back here.
Only 15 minutes more...
Perhaps, you are sucking down some coffee before dashing off to work. Maybe you are getting ready to go to your morning Chem Lab. Whatever the reason, sit down and click on the link to Relevant Radio and listen to the interview with me, Fr. T, which will kick off in about 12 minutes.
Update: my bad, the interview starts at 8:00 a.m. If you listened, you got the bonus coverage of the great spiritual classic, Abandonment to Divine Providence.
Perhaps, you are sucking down some coffee before dashing off to work. Maybe you are getting ready to go to your morning Chem Lab. Whatever the reason, sit down and click on the link to Relevant Radio and listen to the interview with me, Fr. T, which will kick off in about 12 minutes.
Update: my bad, the interview starts at 8:00 a.m. If you listened, you got the bonus coverage of the great spiritual classic, Abandonment to Divine Providence.
Wednesday, March 02, 2005
Tentacles galore!
I often comment to Fr. Tharp that his many (worthwhile) pastoral initiatives, which he shares with other parishes (sending them his adult formation series The Borromeo Project, and speaking in other parishes), are analogous to tentacles from his megalomaniacal ego stretching out, spreading his influence far and wide. Of course, this is done in all jest and Fr. Tharp, to be fair, does not have a megalomaniacal ego (his is pretty close, but not quite that bad!).
Well, he's not the only one with tentacles folks! No, I haven't grown dreadlocks, but I, too, am preparing to headline a group of speakers in the coming weeks on the topic of marriage and family life. Longtime CRM readers may recall that last spring Fr. Tharp and I were among the speakers at a marriage and family life conference put on by another pastor in the archdiocese. Well, that pastor was moved to a new parish this past summer and guess what? Now in a new parish and with a college campus ministry program, that pastor has asked us to speak again. This time, rather than doing it all in one day as we did last time, we are each coming on a Wednesday night to speak on our subject matter. So, the influence is spreading far and wide, thanks to greedy tentacles and the pastoral vision of Fr. Mark Mason who has now organized this important formation at two parishes! May God bless his work and ours!
I often comment to Fr. Tharp that his many (worthwhile) pastoral initiatives, which he shares with other parishes (sending them his adult formation series The Borromeo Project, and speaking in other parishes), are analogous to tentacles from his megalomaniacal ego stretching out, spreading his influence far and wide. Of course, this is done in all jest and Fr. Tharp, to be fair, does not have a megalomaniacal ego (his is pretty close, but not quite that bad!).
Well, he's not the only one with tentacles folks! No, I haven't grown dreadlocks, but I, too, am preparing to headline a group of speakers in the coming weeks on the topic of marriage and family life. Longtime CRM readers may recall that last spring Fr. Tharp and I were among the speakers at a marriage and family life conference put on by another pastor in the archdiocese. Well, that pastor was moved to a new parish this past summer and guess what? Now in a new parish and with a college campus ministry program, that pastor has asked us to speak again. This time, rather than doing it all in one day as we did last time, we are each coming on a Wednesday night to speak on our subject matter. So, the influence is spreading far and wide, thanks to greedy tentacles and the pastoral vision of Fr. Mark Mason who has now organized this important formation at two parishes! May God bless his work and ours!
Monday, February 28, 2005
Tonight's Pastoral Extravaganza
You may recall that my parish's Advent Penance Rite had to be canceled due to inclement weather. Tonight was our Lenten Penance Rite and weather permitted! So, here's a summary for all CRM readers of tonight's pastoral extravaganza: 9 priests hearing confessions and almost 300 people receiving this Sacrament (including around 80 First Confessions for the kids)! Christ has renewed so many in this parish by reinstating their baptismal dignity!
You may recall that my parish's Advent Penance Rite had to be canceled due to inclement weather. Tonight was our Lenten Penance Rite and weather permitted! So, here's a summary for all CRM readers of tonight's pastoral extravaganza: 9 priests hearing confessions and almost 300 people receiving this Sacrament (including around 80 First Confessions for the kids)! Christ has renewed so many in this parish by reinstating their baptismal dignity!
I'M BACK...
Hi devoted CRM readers. In case you did not notice, I been away for awhile. I actually tried to post a piece about 10 days ago, but Blogger continues to displays bouts of discrimination against Mac users, and no matter what I did, it would not publish my meanderings from the month of February.
I went away for a week of R&R with a priest friend of mine from the Diocese of Allentown. My parents bought a time-share last year and had a bonus week to use up by March, and they graciously gave it to their loving son. I cashed it in for a week in Williamsburg, VA. I tried to go someplace warmer, but they were all booked. The main goal was just to get away from the ringing phones. A time-share is basically an apartment you rent for a week or so; this one was a nice two bedroom one. Actually they apparently had a lot of activities at this place, but we opted to to rest, did a lot of reading, and explored some of our nation's history.
First let me say, that based on the "off-season" ticket price to get a badge for Colonial Williamsburg, history is not cheap. Wow! it was nearly $30/person for a 1-day pass. We opted to just walk around the "town". What was truly a bargain was the combo ticket for the Jamestown Visitors' Center and Yorktown Victory Center. I highly recommend spending time at both locations. It was $17 for the combo, and you did not have to do both on the same day. In fact, we were not sure if we wanted to do both and they told us to get the pass for just the one (Jamestown) for $11.75, hold on to our receipt, and if we went to Yorktown just show it and ask for the upgrade. Both sites had very nicely organized galleries for looking at artifacts from the respective sites, nice information, a decently done short film -- all before you got to the main attraction. At Jamestown first you go through a reconstructed Powhatan Native American village. There "interpreters" (historical actors) did a fine job explaining some of the basics of Powhatan life, you could even ground corn if you wanted (it was too early to work the fields). Then we went to the replicas of the three ships which brought the settlers in 1607. You could pretty much go all over the ships, and an the interpreters were exceedingly knowledgeable and friendly. Finally we went to the reconstruction of the actually fort; again you could go all over, handle different objects, watch tradesmen work. The actually site of the fort was thought to have sunk into the James River, but has been recently discovered and is about a mile from the reconstructed one. We spent nearly 4 hours there. Yorktown was the same basic format; this time it was a troop camp and a colonial farm.
Today I spent the day finding my desk under a pile of mail, and addressing issues that had been awaiting my return. As we are expecting a snowstorm, and the cook was off, I cooked dinner for the four of us -- hopefully there will still be four of us in the morning. The one thing that nearly brought a tear to my eye from my vacation (besides a visit to the "new" St. Bede's parish in Williamsburg which epitomizes all that is HORRIBLE in modern "worship space" design, but that is another blog piece, to correspond with a marvelously designed new church which my friend is stationed at) was that as we were driving back a stone was kicked up and cracked the windshield of my NEW car (only 4 weeks old today). It is good to be back.
Hi devoted CRM readers. In case you did not notice, I been away for awhile. I actually tried to post a piece about 10 days ago, but Blogger continues to displays bouts of discrimination against Mac users, and no matter what I did, it would not publish my meanderings from the month of February.
I went away for a week of R&R with a priest friend of mine from the Diocese of Allentown. My parents bought a time-share last year and had a bonus week to use up by March, and they graciously gave it to their loving son. I cashed it in for a week in Williamsburg, VA. I tried to go someplace warmer, but they were all booked. The main goal was just to get away from the ringing phones. A time-share is basically an apartment you rent for a week or so; this one was a nice two bedroom one. Actually they apparently had a lot of activities at this place, but we opted to to rest, did a lot of reading, and explored some of our nation's history.
First let me say, that based on the "off-season" ticket price to get a badge for Colonial Williamsburg, history is not cheap. Wow! it was nearly $30/person for a 1-day pass. We opted to just walk around the "town". What was truly a bargain was the combo ticket for the Jamestown Visitors' Center and Yorktown Victory Center. I highly recommend spending time at both locations. It was $17 for the combo, and you did not have to do both on the same day. In fact, we were not sure if we wanted to do both and they told us to get the pass for just the one (Jamestown) for $11.75, hold on to our receipt, and if we went to Yorktown just show it and ask for the upgrade. Both sites had very nicely organized galleries for looking at artifacts from the respective sites, nice information, a decently done short film -- all before you got to the main attraction. At Jamestown first you go through a reconstructed Powhatan Native American village. There "interpreters" (historical actors) did a fine job explaining some of the basics of Powhatan life, you could even ground corn if you wanted (it was too early to work the fields). Then we went to the replicas of the three ships which brought the settlers in 1607. You could pretty much go all over the ships, and an the interpreters were exceedingly knowledgeable and friendly. Finally we went to the reconstruction of the actually fort; again you could go all over, handle different objects, watch tradesmen work. The actually site of the fort was thought to have sunk into the James River, but has been recently discovered and is about a mile from the reconstructed one. We spent nearly 4 hours there. Yorktown was the same basic format; this time it was a troop camp and a colonial farm.
Today I spent the day finding my desk under a pile of mail, and addressing issues that had been awaiting my return. As we are expecting a snowstorm, and the cook was off, I cooked dinner for the four of us -- hopefully there will still be four of us in the morning. The one thing that nearly brought a tear to my eye from my vacation (besides a visit to the "new" St. Bede's parish in Williamsburg which epitomizes all that is HORRIBLE in modern "worship space" design, but that is another blog piece, to correspond with a marvelously designed new church which my friend is stationed at) was that as we were driving back a stone was kicked up and cracked the windshield of my NEW car (only 4 weeks old today). It is good to be back.
Cognitive dissonance
Sometimes you come across two things which, standing on their own, wouldn't get much notice, but when put together create some cognitive dissonance. Such was the case when I opened the mail a couple of days ago. I read the opening line of one letter:
"The Easter holiday brings with it a time to reflect on the life, death, and resurrection of Christ and the tremendous impact that has had on our lives." The use of "holiday" aside, why the dissonance?
Because of the letterhead. Twentieth Century Fox, Beverly Hills, California. I think Fr. Tharp got this promotional letter too.
Sometimes you come across two things which, standing on their own, wouldn't get much notice, but when put together create some cognitive dissonance. Such was the case when I opened the mail a couple of days ago. I read the opening line of one letter:
"The Easter holiday brings with it a time to reflect on the life, death, and resurrection of Christ and the tremendous impact that has had on our lives." The use of "holiday" aside, why the dissonance?
Because of the letterhead. Twentieth Century Fox, Beverly Hills, California. I think Fr. Tharp got this promotional letter too.
Sunday, February 27, 2005
Jacob's well: Homily Third Sunday of Lent
I don't usually make a post regarding my homilies, simply because I normally don't have a script and I don't want to take the time to type one out. Today, since the gospel was very long, I had some simple thoughts and so I feel that I can manage to share them without getting bogged down in typing. Actually, I will post the ideas and the story of my homily, rather than the homily as it was given.
I chose to focus my thoughts on the rather simple statement at the beginning of the gospel for the Third Sunday of Lent, a statement that set the scene: "Jacob's well was there." This simple sentence, so easy to pass by, struck me because of what I read a few years ago while doing homily preparation as I was reading a scriptural commentary. The commentary mentioned that if John (the gospel's author) was trying to consistently use "Jacob" imagery in this selection from the fourth chapter of his gospel, we can note that the well was a place of courtship in the story of Jacob's life. To understand this you have to go back to the Book of Genesis 29:1-12. It was at a well where Jacob first laid eyes upon Rachel and fell in love with her, rolling back a large stone to release water to relieve the thirst of the flock that Rachel was tending. Jacob kissed Rachel there and sought to marry her.
The well as a place of courtship really struck me. Now, PLEASE, in my application of this notion from Jacob's story to the gospel of Jesus at the well with the Samaritan woman, I am NOT trying to say that Jesus was courting her in a way that relates to marriage. I'm not writing the Da Vinci Code here! Rather, I think we can make an application that the well is the place where Jesus courts the soul and seeks to give it to drink of his abundance. Jesus (who really is the rock that gushes forth water and, indeed, the very well itself) at the well is an image for us of the love of God in the flesh who courts our souls.
I think most of us have some idea of what it is like to fall in love and to court someone. I think by examining some of what we do when we fall in love and court someone, we can see how we ought to respond to the love of Jesus who courts us. With no intention of giving scandal, I am going to share some sense of love and courtship from my own experience, recognizing that we often don't think of our priests as human, as persons who fall in love. [Note: Let me say in this forum, that the examples I am going to give from my own experience describe, at best, "puppy love" and may seem rather juvenile to many readers. I realize that I could have made all sorts of other examples, more mature examples, of things we do when in love and when courting someone, but the key to my homily examples was that it was my own experience. Since I entered seminary at 19 years of age, I don't have many "more mature" examples, other than the simple ones I gave. In other words, I can only share from my experience and since I wasn't dating in more mature years, I don't have anything to offer from personal experience other than "puppy love" examples. I hope this little note makes sense.]
1. When we fall in love and court someone, we desire to get information about the "other". We ask questions. We see what our friends know about the other person. We learn about the other. I can recall asking, "What are her likes and dislikes?" "Does she like U2?" "Does she like the same kinds of things I like?" We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we seek to get information and to learn about Christ through the Sacred Scriptures? Do we study our faith? Do good books about our faith gather dust at home or do we even own good books that help us learn about the faith? Is our faith taught in the home? I am amazed by the number of misunderstandings I encounter about our faith, even among "life-long" Catholics! If Jesus loves and courts us, shouldn't we respond in love, seeking to know him better, seeking information about him, seeking to know his likes and dislikes?
2. When we fall in love and court someone, we clean ourselves up, we pay attention to hygiene, to how we dress, we use cologne. It is rather embarrassing, but I can remember in high school trying to impress the girls by how I dressed. I would think about what I should wear and, well, if it is this shirt, then the sleeves have to be rolled up, and, oh yeah, the shirt has to be untucked -- that will really attract the girls. I can also remember driving in my car, seeing that I was about to pass a young lady in the other lane ... Suddenly, I was sitting up more straight, and making sure my sunglasses looked just right! We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we take care of what we might call our "spiritual hygiene," seeking to keep our baptismal garment, our baptismal dignity, unstained? We put on cologne to impress others. What about putting on the odor of sanctity as a response to Jesus' love? Recognizing that each and every one of us struggles with temptation and sin, do we get ourselves to confession, to have freedom from sin and to have our baptismal dignity restored?
3. When we fall in love and court someone, we try to be where the other is, near, close by, somewhere where we might catch a glimpse of the other or be seen by the other. "Hey, is she going to be at the party Friday night?" Maybe I wasn't planning on going before, but I will now. And why not go to the mall, and hang out near the pizza stand, because she just might walk out of the movie theatre any second. We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we seek to be where Jesus is, to be near to him, to catch a glimpse of him? What about Sunday Mass? Do we gather where Jesus is present and where his people gather? Do we recognize that we encounter Jesus each and every time we come to Mass and so, we should be here at least every Sunday, not just once in a while, not just regularly (meaning once or twice each month) but each and every Sunday? Do we make visits to the church for adoration? The Lord's Real Presence is here all day and sadly very few people are present. What about Stations of the Cross? Do we come to catch a glimpse of Jesus as he passes by on his way to Calvary, his way to our salvation?
4. When we fall in love and court someone, we talk to the other. We pass notes or send e-mails. We have friends deliver messages to the one we love. We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we recognize prayer as our talking with Jesus, as our communication with the one who loves us and who calls us to respond to him in love? Do we spend time communicating with the Lord, in a sense sending him notes? Do we ask saints and friends to pray for us, to send messages to the Lord on our behalf? Prayer is our privileged communication with Jesus. The catechism, using the imagery of today's gospel, gives a beautiful description of prayer: "The wonder of prayer is revealed beside the well where we come seeking water: there, Christ comes to meet every human being. It is he who first seeks us and asks us for a drink. Jesus thirsts; his asking arises from the depths of God's desire for us. Whether we realize it or not, prayer is the encounter of God's thirst with ours. God thirsts that we may thirst for him" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 2560).
The well is the place of Jesus' courting of the Samaritan woman's faith. Jesus courts our souls too, seeking our faith. In this season of repentance and conversion we should practice some of these natural responses to love in our relationship with the Lord who loves us, who thirsts for our loving response, and who comes to us as the Savior of the world!
I don't usually make a post regarding my homilies, simply because I normally don't have a script and I don't want to take the time to type one out. Today, since the gospel was very long, I had some simple thoughts and so I feel that I can manage to share them without getting bogged down in typing. Actually, I will post the ideas and the story of my homily, rather than the homily as it was given.
I chose to focus my thoughts on the rather simple statement at the beginning of the gospel for the Third Sunday of Lent, a statement that set the scene: "Jacob's well was there." This simple sentence, so easy to pass by, struck me because of what I read a few years ago while doing homily preparation as I was reading a scriptural commentary. The commentary mentioned that if John (the gospel's author) was trying to consistently use "Jacob" imagery in this selection from the fourth chapter of his gospel, we can note that the well was a place of courtship in the story of Jacob's life. To understand this you have to go back to the Book of Genesis 29:1-12. It was at a well where Jacob first laid eyes upon Rachel and fell in love with her, rolling back a large stone to release water to relieve the thirst of the flock that Rachel was tending. Jacob kissed Rachel there and sought to marry her.
The well as a place of courtship really struck me. Now, PLEASE, in my application of this notion from Jacob's story to the gospel of Jesus at the well with the Samaritan woman, I am NOT trying to say that Jesus was courting her in a way that relates to marriage. I'm not writing the Da Vinci Code here! Rather, I think we can make an application that the well is the place where Jesus courts the soul and seeks to give it to drink of his abundance. Jesus (who really is the rock that gushes forth water and, indeed, the very well itself) at the well is an image for us of the love of God in the flesh who courts our souls.
I think most of us have some idea of what it is like to fall in love and to court someone. I think by examining some of what we do when we fall in love and court someone, we can see how we ought to respond to the love of Jesus who courts us. With no intention of giving scandal, I am going to share some sense of love and courtship from my own experience, recognizing that we often don't think of our priests as human, as persons who fall in love. [Note: Let me say in this forum, that the examples I am going to give from my own experience describe, at best, "puppy love" and may seem rather juvenile to many readers. I realize that I could have made all sorts of other examples, more mature examples, of things we do when in love and when courting someone, but the key to my homily examples was that it was my own experience. Since I entered seminary at 19 years of age, I don't have many "more mature" examples, other than the simple ones I gave. In other words, I can only share from my experience and since I wasn't dating in more mature years, I don't have anything to offer from personal experience other than "puppy love" examples. I hope this little note makes sense.]
1. When we fall in love and court someone, we desire to get information about the "other". We ask questions. We see what our friends know about the other person. We learn about the other. I can recall asking, "What are her likes and dislikes?" "Does she like U2?" "Does she like the same kinds of things I like?" We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we seek to get information and to learn about Christ through the Sacred Scriptures? Do we study our faith? Do good books about our faith gather dust at home or do we even own good books that help us learn about the faith? Is our faith taught in the home? I am amazed by the number of misunderstandings I encounter about our faith, even among "life-long" Catholics! If Jesus loves and courts us, shouldn't we respond in love, seeking to know him better, seeking information about him, seeking to know his likes and dislikes?
2. When we fall in love and court someone, we clean ourselves up, we pay attention to hygiene, to how we dress, we use cologne. It is rather embarrassing, but I can remember in high school trying to impress the girls by how I dressed. I would think about what I should wear and, well, if it is this shirt, then the sleeves have to be rolled up, and, oh yeah, the shirt has to be untucked -- that will really attract the girls. I can also remember driving in my car, seeing that I was about to pass a young lady in the other lane ... Suddenly, I was sitting up more straight, and making sure my sunglasses looked just right! We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we take care of what we might call our "spiritual hygiene," seeking to keep our baptismal garment, our baptismal dignity, unstained? We put on cologne to impress others. What about putting on the odor of sanctity as a response to Jesus' love? Recognizing that each and every one of us struggles with temptation and sin, do we get ourselves to confession, to have freedom from sin and to have our baptismal dignity restored?
3. When we fall in love and court someone, we try to be where the other is, near, close by, somewhere where we might catch a glimpse of the other or be seen by the other. "Hey, is she going to be at the party Friday night?" Maybe I wasn't planning on going before, but I will now. And why not go to the mall, and hang out near the pizza stand, because she just might walk out of the movie theatre any second. We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we seek to be where Jesus is, to be near to him, to catch a glimpse of him? What about Sunday Mass? Do we gather where Jesus is present and where his people gather? Do we recognize that we encounter Jesus each and every time we come to Mass and so, we should be here at least every Sunday, not just once in a while, not just regularly (meaning once or twice each month) but each and every Sunday? Do we make visits to the church for adoration? The Lord's Real Presence is here all day and sadly very few people are present. What about Stations of the Cross? Do we come to catch a glimpse of Jesus as he passes by on his way to Calvary, his way to our salvation?
4. When we fall in love and court someone, we talk to the other. We pass notes or send e-mails. We have friends deliver messages to the one we love. We do this quite easily with natural love. What about applying this to our spiritual lives and the love with which we should respond to Jesus who courts us and our faith? Do we recognize prayer as our talking with Jesus, as our communication with the one who loves us and who calls us to respond to him in love? Do we spend time communicating with the Lord, in a sense sending him notes? Do we ask saints and friends to pray for us, to send messages to the Lord on our behalf? Prayer is our privileged communication with Jesus. The catechism, using the imagery of today's gospel, gives a beautiful description of prayer: "The wonder of prayer is revealed beside the well where we come seeking water: there, Christ comes to meet every human being. It is he who first seeks us and asks us for a drink. Jesus thirsts; his asking arises from the depths of God's desire for us. Whether we realize it or not, prayer is the encounter of God's thirst with ours. God thirsts that we may thirst for him" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 2560).
The well is the place of Jesus' courting of the Samaritan woman's faith. Jesus courts our souls too, seeking our faith. In this season of repentance and conversion we should practice some of these natural responses to love in our relationship with the Lord who loves us, who thirsts for our loving response, and who comes to us as the Savior of the world!
An Open Note to the Priests of My Archdiocese
I certainly accept the fact you and I will not always agree on matters disputable or formulate in forms standard. But I would hope that you would have the nut clusters to say it to my face so that it could actually be...oh, I don't know...fraternal correction. Just don't do what this clue-tard has pulled.
I certainly accept the fact you and I will not always agree on matters disputable or formulate in forms standard. But I would hope that you would have the nut clusters to say it to my face so that it could actually be...oh, I don't know...fraternal correction. Just don't do what this clue-tard has pulled.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















